IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Tue, 25 March 2008 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E80828C4B5; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HenMnijo68dY; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BE428C44A; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EE728C494 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2zy5ycEOh59 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA1A28C409 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2PMURNF072389; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:30:27 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200803252230.m2PMURNF072389@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:38:07 PDT." <20080325133807.GA12616@boreas.isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:30:27 +1100
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:00:23AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> > Ned Freed wrote:
> > 
> > > If the consensus is that better interoperability can be had
> > > by banning bare AAAA records that's perfectly fine with me.
> > 
> > FWIW, I'd like that...
> > 
> > >> Clarity can be established and interoperability _improved_ 
> > >> by limiting discovery to just A and MX records.  Perhaps a
> > >> note might be included that at some point in the future MX
> > >> records may become required.
> >  
> > > Again, I have no problem with this approach if that's what
> > > the consensus is.
> > 
> > ...and that, too.  
> 
> 	so what is supposed to happen when I remove all
> 	"A" RR's from my zones?

	The same thing that happens today with zones that don't
	have A records.  You use MX records to refer to machines
	that have address (A and/or AAAA) records.

	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email