Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 26 March 2008 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE1428C5F8; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjgQVKMJOZRf; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B2E3A6F15; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECD63A6CA1 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nig8Ex+xPCc for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7103A6E13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1JeYMb-00040m-Vy; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:20:34 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:20:31 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Message-ID: <6EE2433407437A5F9F922A57@p3.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0803261044440.12376@netcore.fi>
References: <20080325133807.GA12616@boreas.isi.edu> <200803252230.m2PMURNF072389@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080326023244.GB26917@boreas.isi.edu> <01MSUMAAFHKW00007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <200803260645.m2Q6j3JX024997@burp.tkv.asdf.org> <alpine.LRH.1.10.0803261044440.12376@netcore.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com, Mark_Andrews@isc.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, ietf@ietf.org, bmanning@ISI.EDU
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


--On Wednesday, 26 March, 2008 10:52 +0200 Pekka Savola
<pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:

>> As a private person using the "A record only" way of
>> receiving mail, I find it useful.
> 
> It might be helpful in this context if you could elaborate a
> bit why  you find it useful?
> 
> The only reason I can think of is if (web?) UI of DNS hosting
> company  would make it burdensome to update both MX and the A
> record.

Even that is unlikely since, if the same mail server is used for
IPv4 and IPv6 transport, the MX would not change ... one would
merely need to add an AAAA RR for the same host to the
presumably-existing A RR.   A hosting provider who would not let
one do that is, almost by definition, not providing IPv6
support, which is not an SMPT problem.

   john





_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf