Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (4) (was: Lists and aliases)

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Fri, 14 December 2007 01:12 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2z6k-0003zg-Rj; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:12:54 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2z6j-0003zL-5M for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:12:53 -0500
Received: from dsl-66-59-230-40.static.linkline.com ([66.59.230.40] helo=mauve.mrochek.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2z6i-0007i9-QD for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:12:53 -0500
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MOUKY5TVGW00IDRI@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01MOSTWOKPVK00BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <01MOUKY4OKAU00BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:11:54 -0800
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:33:58 -0500" <337421D4CD3C7088A0CC2CCE@p3.JCK.COM>
References: <E1IwpJr-0007aa-OQ@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <fjft2g$a68$1@ger.gmane.org> <p06250146c382498c24bc@[192.17.144.29]> <01MOQB3814UM00BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com> <43B8E5E553E5D4375D744E34@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <01MORQNS3TG000ISSF@mauve.mrochek.com> <fjpf7t$gut$1@ger.gmane.org> <01MOUGU5ICN000BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com> <337421D4CD3C7088A0CC2CCE@p3.JCK.COM>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1197594768; h=Date: From:Subject:MIME-version:Content-type; b=UhS0ZDLG4IWCtUpv/t2AYKdsM 5iRmi5dBXLqIOFRqYhk4LhXqj+m6prHlqbWQ8ktL15dOoPYN1n73KBdWZpskw==
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (4) (was: Lists and aliases)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


> --On Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 17:05 -0800 Ned Freed
> <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:

> > I would prefer to have a reference to 2822upd, but I suspect
> > this decision dates back to when it wasn't clear that 2822bis
> > was going to get updated more or less at the same time.

> This is, of course, the sort of thing that can be changed in an
> RFC Editor note if, in fact, 2822 is ready and more or less
> concurrent.

That's what i was hoping you'd say - if 2822upd is ready such a change would be
a very good thing IMO.

				Ned

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf