Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

At 00:27 26-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote:
>         what this daft is trying to do is force the presumptive
>         existance of an MX in a zone into an explict rule that
>         forces the existance of an MX, else SMTP fails.

That's not what Section 5.1 (Locating the Target Host) of the draft says.

At 19:31 25-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote:
>example.com.  soa (
>         stuff
>         )
>
>         ns foo.
>         ns bar.
>;
>mailhost   aaaa  fe80::21a:92ff:fe99:2ab1
>
>         is what i am using today.

The above will work.  This is considered as a MX with a preference of 
0 pointing to mailhost.example.com.

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf