Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 26 March 2008 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D64A28C57C; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zpc5eyH5O1d; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C013A6E29; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFF93A6E29 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdaOHHvvfi+u for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384223A6A02 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 76297 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2008 18:50:39 -0000
Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Mar 2008 18:50:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Mar 2008 18:50:39 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:50:39 -0400
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
In-Reply-To: <47EA8CD8.3010500@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.00.0803261436260.36932@simone.iecc.com>
References: <20080326150139.86203.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <47EA8CD8.3010500@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (BSF 882 2007-12-20)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>> Not to be cynical or anything, but regardless of what we decree, I 
>> think it's vanishingly unlikely that many systems on the public 
>> Internet* will accept mail from a domain with only an AAAA record.

> I think it's vanishing unlikely that email will be useful at all, if spam 
> filter writers keep trashing mail based on such dubious criteria.

Not to reignite the usual spam argument, but it is (unfortunately in this 
case) not 1988 or even 1998 any more.  When upwards of 90% of all mail is 
spam, keeping mail usable is at least as dependent on limiting the spam 
that shows up in people's mailboxes as delivering the trickle of good 
mail.

Real life spam filters use metrics and tune to the actual behavior of 
mailers.  If most of the mail that comes from domains with AAAA and no MX 
is spam, they'll tune for that, and it won't be a mistake.  For the 
forseeable future, most such mail will be from zombies, and it'll all be 
spam.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf