Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero IETF

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 21 March 2023 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6000C14CE36 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="ofp2CLjj"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="XmXkeinP"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrI6nSuDARyC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B05C14CE40 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 92416 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2023 17:20:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=168fe.6419e752.k2303; bh=BbPV+a1VtkSXubj7jpc91EBYLHKyl7oK7RjZiXm+thk=; b=ofp2CLjj8mlwbH8EPiWPld/RN4DCGRSh+LfqxIri8se+rWHPs54aKcReX81/y91Y8qSEgiE420X/elmjy61b0x0fakxr/eXAkLWUzCF2K++Ny5x+j+6H7ITzbUWLaqE6kC3Rw0xZm4pDEsNgMtk8opJghZ0lfR9EKrrNuAax9ZF3g4z4TaTGxI+009QpJPqUYUaChhUMlwZBjrk4lst7TvuGpk1WVsSePPtx2pe0Ar7fK8zwyAyA4xpCbX7UArPu4AEkNXprQidggU9DVyGIC3uiKrAEKzAnisrTJGfjn80Cse1WaJQTFazOdjwjhTtm081Y+oTM5+iCp4DFQjS//w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=168fe.6419e752.k2303; bh=BbPV+a1VtkSXubj7jpc91EBYLHKyl7oK7RjZiXm+thk=; b=XmXkeinPvBjEJeIeJHVR/bc4g9Jr7kaduuy6WDFPQBw2pnBIzHIDQbwA2/S3+iTjrSwguHI+2YU5M4NVGPwZJCZvc/9kNfnNStz50jUg97HaWAIGdFd3fOx7sYeCuOHCWcoAJoe1gwOOMkwezpl/5qu+4dFx8nkJuUOAlUXb9CtPL3egNS8nXPT6UpI0xk2/RU5I6sxl4Qrq5vHyZ1JZ0iNNas27aqKm1NEwuZFom7Zba3sojbFXMtVAKdmlQOK+AtKHvAyRXIRu0lSTvaWVDflYnZUnlXNtmWUlvN7hAB6owbvvBGbpdn6YiJMpFKMncQ2cVulNTFUOsArar6Ilpg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 21 Mar 2023 17:20:17 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 18971B41BD75; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:20:24 -0400
Message-Id: <20230321172025.18971B41BD75@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Reply-To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero IETF
In-Reply-To: <B8DF18B2-77A2-4A6B-962A-DEFBB1EDFF5A@staff.ietf.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GhmVK_9DuleXBykBm5zljVMBu9c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:20:25 -0000

It appears that Greg Wood  <ghwood@staff.ietf.org> said:
>While skepticism about carbon offsetting is not unwarranted, I can say with confidence that the IETF LLC staff, Secretariat and other people who have worked on the project were and are focused on
>doing what we can to improve the actual situation, and not just appearances. IETF participants have fairly consistently indicated they are in favor of being more environmentally sustainable, and
>this seems like a reasonable step towards that goal, while also being in scope for the IETF LLC.

I don't think anyone doubts your good faith or the LLCs, but I
also reiterate the point that carbon offsets are for suckers.

Earlier this year I virtually sat in on a seminar series at the Yale
forestry school about how you design forest carbon offsets and it
became clear that you have to make some extremely optimistic
assumptions. You have to believe that whoever has sold you the offset
will be able and willing to prevent logging in some remote forest for
fifty years, and also that they won't turn around resell the same
offset to someone else next year and the year after that. They talked
about how one might audit these things, but it wasn't very persuasive.

We can certainly look at ways to decrease the amount of CO2 our
meetings generate, e.g., by looking for venues that require less air
travel, but we should not imagine that we can fix the rest of it by
buying phantom offsets.

R's,
John