Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Tue, 21 March 2023 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A766C151532 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dkN_f6jcSIB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48E2C14CF1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id f19-20020a9d5f13000000b00693ce5a2f3eso9284152oti.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1679432820; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KAbtiCi7vsr2WJnNxiPo5iMy6mRaN8SKoPOaYqNE3Is=; b=Y5QdD1cd9KH0zCRWY7kePEfX8cpFwYn++SsharjqIi5DOZuvuOOKEPRZ56jlAKrevJ pYBdeqwxQwW9Id96Kd3dXb0dHlBwLufPysa1RuGzU0Zf4quEBkfrGIlXDQ4wQ62iJPU9 wij0NnKBBWxzSeRZHy4dgajgSoi8OCPYMuB+tZWaqD8wYoQ2p/OoCnv3AnFLfSg/subF Wi2lYcdzsbfghtTKajkdvwQHiPRmwRZmVkB7p7qneO95CPwtPQvrOH+ZH777ZLIRtswi x4ajyA9OIKG9vEb1lszNCgSuxx1BN9zIcNj3bP04RlKViUvAsUlrazj0w0SA/DdiHz1T BSyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679432820; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=KAbtiCi7vsr2WJnNxiPo5iMy6mRaN8SKoPOaYqNE3Is=; b=pf3m7hNXBEVSt14YKMXHdfqVublUGDQi7/IQ2dwyyuOCONLUUJ3I2JtgHgACnZBrhm dfgfYqdOMBDzjUJytGrZNi8LlgHDEbpFbQydylPzPLlAbSP0a8ZDoh76e7DvzII7wti1 JJvvx9065pr3DL21Twxq2YQt+FTmWKHAKHnRuvLmjXt6PkGIjvKnpn9gdbXZUeLJgOUp 1ru3tPWxBAgi+XQ25JGjxAaPC3JZRDb/G3zNmPfziZRlIHgqnwqIw9GVA9yO/89oDGQz drtqKYTvStIRwD/DCL8pLECK18cdVMUktOdmcymQvr0Owl186hOhyY4nsBtcjrmmCbab KAmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV7I8AZv1eXoiIVgCsceFB1f9wSaejx2Fx2+FhJCGrB0r4+dQ0j BKnFAtZuT/82dCzdL41MWWixPK6ttVdiZ6aJCaBYdg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/x7Qf1w0s+ewy/Bgf1FBdXVB7UmS24GDaYSfVux7BNeHNjFP0m9G9OA7idAQsETEw4do1b2GYCzAdB3UyyJKE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1483:b0:68b:cd1e:1ef1 with SMTP id s3-20020a056830148300b0068bcd1e1ef1mr191567otq.7.1679432819803; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <02F23373-9F6A-420E-91B3-C1ADE5AF2A60@staff.ietf.org> <928d9a46-ff69-12df-fc30-b0ff7f1f8cec@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <928d9a46-ff69-12df-fc30-b0ff7f1f8cec@huitema.net>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:06:48 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn2sWGXXtEhX1h-m9ATdKOS3y-AcF3Duse6wKK_kF1tB0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a6248105f76f6c5d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yjc-KmVyq_FMXASajmPGlOtJCz0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:07:05 -0000

I agree with Christian.

Yes to quantify, measure, understand.

No to offsets without a lot more discussion.

These are disjoint activities. It's not both or nothing.

-George


On Wed, 22 Mar 2023, 01:16 Christian Huitema, <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:

> I am pretty disappointed to see the IETF LLC investing in the "carbon
> offset" strategy, let alone paying consultants to produce an expensive
> report.
>