Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero IETF
Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Tue, 21 March 2023 20:21 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50746C14CE5E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Snnp8-bUFAxB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alt-proxy28.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy28.mail.unifiedlayer.com [74.220.216.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF665C14CF05 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw11.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.126]) by progateway1.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1058110040610 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:21:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from box5527.bluehost.com ([162.241.218.19]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id eiTtpQkfNaaYZeiTtp1q2U; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:21:18 +0000
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=b813XvKx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=641a11be a=KXpOjjFwo8kCkgxs2x2AJQ==:117 a=KXpOjjFwo8kCkgxs2x2AJQ==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=-kFOsPF1Im4zmhyN:21 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10:nop_fastflux_from_domain_1 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10:nop_fastflux_mid_domain_1 a=k__wU0fu6RkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=qMgonR0qfJAA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=jqBRFv0mrdUA:10:from_fastflux_domain1 a=0IyQ1RC4AAAA:8 a=ll-iCDY8AAAA:8 a=M0OflfRGAAAA:8 a=YRLU8ZVIAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=QLhupLqRAAAA:8 a=ratK9WaRetkUL32Q36cA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=ivbTfD_dPm4A:10:phone_number_3 a=hAPSbmkYeZgA:10:demote_hacked_domain_4 a=Je86qq7sbXYMP0AVEajm:22 a=5zzXaGx9kK-dnhGc2mZB:22 a=VpyrLIdO_Ztbr3SWPBuH:22 a=6yl0mh0s51TKORVA8GqK:22 a=G0fnPMQLLrhXuW0VSdpZ:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=tar-a19HCcU9EdznJS_w:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:To:From:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3lab1ETNI5x5ofC78sFUP3K+pRd0s4GN79fMAP/2Xvg=; b=D0V6f8iRcqzj4Qodu3vsSYI0zO GcrnwlW6FxEMJVa25syj+R8Hd4nEBigH3qLhTBQH+6GqpQcVMYMRwgWSqP2si7gkLX+ISnvHH3/cB i0gXZn1ORtOIDX7YLeW0KXx8t;
Received: from pool-100-36-48-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.36.48.45]:55390 helo=[192.168.1.214]) by box5527.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1peiTt-001i3b-KU; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:21:17 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.71.23031200
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:21:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero IETF
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <BBB9DEF5-0ADB-4782-911D-06AF37C24DD8@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero IETF
References: <B8DF18B2-77A2-4A6B-962A-DEFBB1EDFF5A@staff.ietf.org> <20230321172025.18971B41BD75@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20230321172025.18971B41BD75@ary.qy>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5527.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.36.48.45
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1peiTt-001i3b-KU
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-36-48-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.214]) [100.36.48.45]:55390
X-Source-Auth: richard@shockey.us
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NTUyNy5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20=
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pmSyexuU44SUEJ5X0FswD2JYOSM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:21:23 -0000
+1 to you John and Christian on this. Offsets like Cap and Trade is exactly what you expect from the bankers and they are SOOO concerned about the environment. <snicker> The trend is exactly the opposite and I run conferences. https://www.prweb.com/releases/the_sip_forum_announces_conference_lineup_for_2023_kyc_summit_and_sipnoc_2023_dates_set/prweb19208729.htm People are sick of virtual events. Teams GOTO Zoom etc. Every communications industry conference I know is reporting record in person attendance. MWC etc.. even 3GPP is creeping back to full in person. They are looking at some big plenary thing in Greece shortly. The USG is slowly but deliberately returning to in person Technical Advisory Committee meetings as well. I'm on a couple at the FCC. The DC Mayor has been complaining loudly to the Biden Administration that all of this virtual stuff is killing downtown DC the office property market, restaurants etc. Make this bovine effluent go away. If you wanted to know why some of us do not want to take new work to the IETF you know now. — Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC Chairman of the Board SIP Forum www.shockey.us www.sipforum.org <http://www.sipforum.org> www.sipnoc.org <http://www.sipnoc.org> (2022) richard<at>shockey.us Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter rshockey101 PSTN +1 703-593-2683 On 3/21/23, 1:20 PM, "ietf on behalf of John Levine" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of johnl@taugh.com <mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote: It appears that Greg Wood <ghwood@staff.ietf.org <mailto:ghwood@staff.ietf.org>> said: >While skepticism about carbon offsetting is not unwarranted, I can say with confidence that the IETF LLC staff, Secretariat and other people who have worked on the project were and are focused on >doing what we can to improve the actual situation, and not just appearances. IETF participants have fairly consistently indicated they are in favor of being more environmentally sustainable, and >this seems like a reasonable step towards that goal, while also being in scope for the IETF LLC. I don't think anyone doubts your good faith or the LLCs, but I also reiterate the point that carbon offsets are for suckers. Earlier this year I virtually sat in on a seminar series at the Yale forestry school about how you design forest carbon offsets and it became clear that you have to make some extremely optimistic assumptions. You have to believe that whoever has sold you the offset will be able and willing to prevent logging in some remote forest for fifty years, and also that they won't turn around resell the same offset to someone else next year and the year after that. They talked about how one might audit these things, but it wasn't very persuasive. We can certainly look at ways to decrease the amount of CO2 our meetings generate, e.g., by looking for venues that require less air travel, but we should not imagine that we can fix the rest of it by buying phantom offsets. R's, John
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John Levine
- Next steps towards a net zero IETF Greg Wood
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Greg Wood
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Wes Hardaker
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John Levine
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John C Klensin
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Richard Shockey
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Eliot Lear
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF George Michaelson
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Ross Finlayson
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Alexander Pelov
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Richard Shockey
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Bob Hinden
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Charlie Perkins
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Richard Shockey
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Raghu Saxena
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Daniel Migault
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Masataka Ohta
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Daniel Migault
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Masataka Ohta
- What are our next steps? Re: Next steps towards a… Eliot Lear
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Julian Reschke
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Alexander Pelov
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Michael McBride
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF willi uebelherr
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Andrew McConachie
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Julian Reschke
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Fred Baker
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Julian Reschke
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Richard Shockey
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Michael Richardson
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Andrew McConachie
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Alexander Pelov
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF John Levine
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John C Klensin
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF John C Klensin
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Daniel Migault
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Michael Richardson
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Lars Eggert
- Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John C Klensin
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Mezgani Ali
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Bob Hinden
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Lars Eggert
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Lars Eggert
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Eliot Lear
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… John C Klensin
- Re: [admin-discuss] Next steps towards a net zero… Abdussalam Baryun