IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CE611E812C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DxUMWKc44mQy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og128.obsmtp.com (exprod7og128.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.121]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C279211E8108 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob128.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUhUFGiQQ+miZq56FFoLLfH+FgD+/Fq+6@postini.com; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:21:15 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAFB1B82AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E5E19006E; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:21:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:21:13 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHOnpYmNVttRC6LkE+NyfK9PIh2+JmgbpoA
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:21:12 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307752602E4@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20130821174432.89957.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130821174432.89957.qmail@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0CE5266CC1A0A34C95D172172D529654@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:22:29 -0000

On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:44 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> This would require some reason why it is worth them spending time and
> money to do something that has no operational benefit whatsoever.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to make an argument for you to refute.   I'm saying that if the people who want to change the outcome of the spfbis consensus are serious, this would be a good way to show that they have community support for their position.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email