IETF Logo Mail Archive

Visibility of shepherd writeup

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 23 August 2013 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB2711E819D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.139
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E5Myu8OISWQt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9821F9C17 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7NAVfHL017126; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:31:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p548921DA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.33.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AEACA11; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:31:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Visibility of shepherd writeup
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCtm6yMj557E3dh5RDtzj5qqBwj=a_GyYydepXSFruHjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:31:40 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A1A7F2C-9E05-41EA-AB89-87D046558C41@tzi.org>
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se> <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com> <E3B3B6B0-F17F-44D0-ACD1-53BDBAC6F2CB@frobbit.se> <5214F97B.2080400@dcrocker.net> <6D6829DE-1242-4877-BB5E-8ECD08D88CB2@frobbit.se> <52150722.1070307@dcrocker.net> <52150DF0.6070800@qti.qualcomm.com> <5215123E.5080203@dcrocker.net> <52151903.4030402@qti.qualcomm.com> <521533DB.4040001@dcrocker.net> <52161EB1.6010506@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAPv4CP-hRRU21-fLNDJaFGSaBoWHwyhoACta+3xSoTiJtOdxkA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCtm6yMj557E3dh5RDtzj5qqB wj=a_GyYydepXSFruHjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Crocker Dave <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:32:10 -0000

On Aug 22, 2013, at 21:23, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> Most Excellent(tm)
> shepherd report:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis/shepherdwriteup/

(This may not have helped much in this case, but:)

Why is it that IETF last-calls do not contain a direct reference the shepherd writeup?
Shouldn't those be required first reading for anyone commenting?

Grüße, Carsten

PS.: The last-call does contain a direct reference to
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis/ballot/
which is 404 at this point in the procedure.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email