Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 19 August 2013 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5511E11E82EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rFHACnJqgC2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADD411E82D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99639 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2013 20:42:59 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Aug 2013 20:42:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=52128353.xn--yuvv84g.k1308; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=D1+kPJ9a9oByNsixsCWTTrniOPIcmOy1S3ovsYJRzZ4=; b=VZ1Y89f0hm/YYevCiw2jfasuOmycHjAeraKfmiTyW0VGegoy5D+8mLLhhz7M/Dij2kKtcq3CAOssKspQtX4Xpzk06Yoe0mwvDWofDrXqyxD5LGDDAN4RNHuMw7be25PBbGr+STOInZCW9qq/d+hIOwINKy5UdwgieU8b5oOZV1Rmf/2L/fbvn1EwOLOhJ2qDcBuuEqdO+1G4DTw6Svafuf9P/i9GwfeChKmvfPTzXBjmwjnE7jl5vCrQppUOkOho
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=52128353.xn--yuvv84g.k1308; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=D1+kPJ9a9oByNsixsCWTTrniOPIcmOy1S3ovsYJRzZ4=; b=kEESQbnhZ7k5JsXVIr/TY9ivBcUJLMUlhpRxRKRWo6hgSFRFd8zWNDSmDDzShZQTZ1ytjFv4Pdggir0iKgw0Fvh9mzYYCuOWNa+58z+PvKMxU53n3JPQY7DRAqXDzfWxKqDvm27jrvcwctN46ouXJZfCZWV02gFEZqrcndCZXQJYKefCjKyAsT/DgvLmYeo7d6LCouo2jvTkqlYigT6ogaaup3heuEoqd7EOFSd6hiZTZO0UmBo71GcCl+viZS5f
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:42:37 -0000
Message-ID: <20130819204237.62528.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: mansaxel@besserwisser.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:43:07 -0000

>There is nothing syntactially worng with those entries. I congratulate
>people advocating SPF in TXT records while also writing parsers.

None of your TXT records are SPF records because they don't start with
the required version tag.  You have two type 99 records that start
with the version tag, which is invalid under section 3.1.2 of RFC 4408
and the similar section 3.2 of 4408bis.  

So you're publishing no SPF information at all.  I gather that you've
tried the popular SPF implementations like libspf2 and verified that
they correctly report that they found nothing.

I really don't understand what point you're making here.

R's,
John