Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 23 August 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C032211E80FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rG2rALKyfymd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F011E80D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 95951 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2013 14:34:25 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 23 Aug 2013 14:34:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=521772f1.xn--i8sz2z.k1308; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=mOG68JQayN0jlL7RU93DpotkUVG+qV4bRLbetOBvQ9g=; b=JcPn7OnAImWbvH/uzJ350tnljx/mPYxletIe9vhGaINGazhW7CiRnDom9zkA0d15l/Q5KSoTMdEg+H49cliIqxxTIYJMZXdLss07DkOim3YU9XrJCyCasGHWXfmatOvhA0CNnEF2KgvonH1wxNpoNleeUaEk4V4G+J2vkSetglWyJU+issCTnHODMGEQwpq39Rkh6vw5Ns3xA7tL48UkV0mZsdqVmhPUKa2cyzsJdPUy0z+q67CGkCKxc7i/+cUS
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=521772f1.xn--i8sz2z.k1308; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=mOG68JQayN0jlL7RU93DpotkUVG+qV4bRLbetOBvQ9g=; b=STx2C/mkcOkxkQVrNsNPtPEpkhEr+5OhrFWTBKxIBfugdnuoToK8gn4ojqk7qLoNUroYe6c712iwugwmM1Pc/bjmgGDTS5XbuonzIaFBKHadwDRrA8dfPOyyqxo/ckohLU4yc4jzV/ww9kCBEA0fy82wc5qLnT3lvLKp4//gYZJqL1qTJq1bdt80q/xXuIsP7AsuOOmts+1y63zbuyr2ANJdIyZ2QWW0BMjwHxvN7rUzz4dZDgpbF8hfV/PDE6+U
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:34:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20130823143402.49936.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <521728B4.5070302@sidn.nl>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:34:30 -0000

>> SPF is ten years old now.  It would be helpful if you could give us a
>> list of other protocols that have had a similar issue with a TXT
>> record at the apex during the past decade.
>
>I don't know of any (at least ones that are used in the global dns
>namespace), and I would like to still not know of any in 2033.
>
>SPF may be a lost cause, let's try and make that the only one.

Since we agree that the issue you're worried about has not arisen even
once in the past decade, could you clarify what problem needs to be
solved here?

R's,
John