IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039C83A1480 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NrB-icqh8Ine for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com (mail-yb1-f176.google.com [209.85.219.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EEB93A147E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id u75so27401248ybi.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:10:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AlZbbJm5SZD/1PH8YtI0/6o+Zmmd+C44QjL6LIWQXZ0=; b=Rd1OgQLgSu3k+epNoi9zg8Ug97MnLrd/jd0bUu1alV0XzyOUVZleNl57ez4ajr7MaI 8ZImW2O7vhSWvxzKIC1WJkJ40O+tiZo3XQPoE/66SdISSU/THW2Zvz8y+R6c61a5zxLz ABvi/OGEBcrJZJ5bZ/5bl/uzpjLirLgYyGpp1XznAsHE2jKOuva94ex0LCVwiuRIePj6 IXzCsUR4/AP+SNHZ5C6eGrTYt0MU00moBVaYou5OZevnuPpphYpil4Y3/aziOJvAVtK1 9V0evXbhEAqC1g6Uqwo/pEbx6gA7OvKjU2fduz9MRR6n99X+V1Rel1AFyLQ29ZpCesVB VCHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321jt4JhZxky1f8xcUbOWiREwTb65QwItOdP5nzVPMlwu3BB8i3 /m0mGVS0uHW+CNdfDloFdNbIUWEb1Fl40r3zSIOEh0VJLS0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznHpA3M/ZabABw6j50gqEd9R70kCCxqb67/Zq5+xqF7UsUjJD/CEop05R0Ga8/BbSdjirbW5kGTYNjFOxo61U=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2f43:: with SMTP id v64mr4446229ybv.302.1614841833491; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:10:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4619acc8-1ed4-52e8-849b-bfda9de61bb0@gont.com.ar> <20210303223604.DE1BD6F84095@ary.qy> <20210303230545.GL30153@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20210303230545.GL30153@localhost>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 02:10:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgsU-EAacVh7g6eDcZ1XwUqpTQnbgRmWhsvFoKz38i_pA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da8fc405bcb0a96e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KbkxDJKsUQ4ezUgCj-XwCk6MFFw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 07:10:36 -0000

Since when did we check people's passports before letting them come to an
IETF meeting? And merely holding a particular passport doesn't make you
subject to sanctions.

The four countries on the terrorism list have some difficulty in making
payments through the international system but thats a problem for the
people trying to come from those countries.

Getting visas for international conferences has always been an issue for
some people.

Unless ISOC is planning to outsource running the NOC to Cuba, I can't see
how it is likely to come up.



On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:36:04PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
> > So can we argue about ASN.1 or something else instead?
>
> I've tried, but I think that one's out of steam for this quarter.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email