Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 05 March 2021 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224863A1E1F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:03:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3D5ydtrgUcld for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:03:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066CD3A1E1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.205.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 125530P4020015 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:03:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1614920593; x=1615006993; i=@elandsys.com; bh=3qjuAt6x/2iM7zmvvgnXjvAs6jTsQOySlWPy8dOSkwM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=2pxCpbsrCYV+Po1ptcwuVT9MSChAxX5vMZQwOFQtzztWvzpgB4pOM2gkS0yvSfMxe NRfjLcOrb5p8itKxhuvFNtBKpukUo4/XJuMD/q3fZMyMTst39e8h3YXJpZEdjNoeCh +55KtlviRrZvltflS25DBCXB70PV/A0JHCduDc1M=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210304203241.13e9b390@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:01:11 -0800
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
In-Reply-To: <cb804ee5-e7e7-a228-f93b-86250b8a7fad@network-heretics.com>
References: <4619acc8-1ed4-52e8-849b-bfda9de61bb0@gont.com.ar> <cb804ee5-e7e7-a228-f93b-86250b8a7fad@network-heretics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tKr--y9wZZIzHfqkeY2a-kEqNFs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:03:23 -0000

Hi Keith,
At 01:43 PM 03-03-2021, Keith Moore wrote:
>In addition to the clarification that Fernando asked for, I guess 
>I'd like to know (vaguely) whether this has been a problem in the 
>past, maybe how many people have been turned away.

There was a well-known case several years ago.  I commented about 
that at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/41o9rJEfNU-eN2NxsE7sZGkO2Ew/

Regards,
S. Moonesamy