Re: Observations on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC1D1A8949 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:20:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8S61izmSNc0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012E71A8948 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x188so48286448pfb.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:20:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nOC++ST2lcRx5DCVHmx0I/SZ9yKjhsuy60nB3QSHjKI=; b=OvEJbDFUC1B9Mac09qi0f+6I0Fi63b5eFW4v6vP3waSVUJN8w9kiNWFAuKhhokXjAX NzXi9VdU8omKHjxHYojLb0gePP/cKoXkgGdQdzmxBcGMV8cnx5ru5grjTRQnO/IpIyN+ M+WHzEgdD24jsy5ZBE5SVjLm0NlaR0qXGn281ZRpxSuhG4SzMQaM6SJYVxv6AiVp7XO1 FmrPj65GmHnqI8ZXTmybVB0zbdJE8jAJ75Yed7iIfH78tLP5mW5/3tBx3m5kxH6n2+vv vgijlMsyatPWkNbcuiaBQTDzCEYbp111u5yArOs7d3EV9y5Isf+kmtPkSN58qqbuz0XS T0kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nOC++ST2lcRx5DCVHmx0I/SZ9yKjhsuy60nB3QSHjKI=; b=LeQ8ka0V8sbHsH9eLtxaOhP2M4K++v6gwE9f2Qru1fNlLzxjfkGqW9sliYQHMrbwcj Nt/VE98daxMtQS8CL3X+dy7fF+FZQMiqL2iwYHnSUAqBpOhnb4hcWCz1Q45QHv3UOMYA zNo9nc4CNiQskPqLQOiIJ1sRpnEcnYApC45rpbiHwc+30bsXqkdhwl53r596S26fiBF0 /QVCojbqzBciBbv3S+0YuHcoTgSxIX2pM6izTYRJN4RtNImPM8tb01yiEZx8bqCW3rJl uWF7o+R5vU8FR8G8apVrDrEeAtvmaz0PBnk2hog+ilm80v0Zks8sfzXKrJemEGd0/7oX Wo2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK7PZ/t3AR0tuRNI8049GNmERWuXlvwkd9X9u8dKngD5eu41Rm9pAlcrG6k8R0xOw==
X-Received: by 10.98.7.219 with SMTP id 88mr30583388pfh.49.1457324425470; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:20:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (216-67-75-57-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.75.57]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y21sm20557872pfa.85.2016.03.06.20.20.23 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:20:24 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Observations on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <E83FC2B4-867D-44C9-AE1B-F4C414ABD041@piuha.net> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657DF2330@dfweml701-chm> <EDFB7D0B-2A49-46BD-A84C-0E1FA07793FA@piuha.net> <m2lh5veycu.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56DD0309.9050701@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:49 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2lh5veycu.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ggSA7b5PFy5kZDGKTrGQOBs99wc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 04:20:27 -0000

On 3/6/16 6:54 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> It's perfectly appropriate to be upset.  I thought of it in a slightly
> different way--like a space that we were exploring and, in the early days,
> we figured out this consistent path through the space: IP, TCP, and so on.
> What's been happening over the last few years is that the IETF is filling
> the rest of the space with every alternative approach, not necessarily any
> better.  Every possible alternative is now being written down.  And it's not
> useful.  -- Jon Postel

I keep going back and forth on this.  If we're going to let
the market decide there's inevitably going to be some waste,
but we really have put a pile of time and effort into standardizing
things that have never seen any uptake and almost certainly
never will.  That doesn't bother me that much, but what does
bother me about it is that that's one of the reasons we're slow.

Melinda