[manet-dlep-rg] Mandatory processing TLVs by routers

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 11 November 2013 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE6011E8107 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dXIlLR5AJgJR for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com (mail-ea0-f173.google.com [209.85.215.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2B421E8064 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id g10so2864691eak.32 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=nmgMuNSdmC9OLuTE346VcPa6KiUqqNVfslAt1r2nAuo=; b=cMzK3ChGEfPB5MMhkQKhEBawDLa+rmguLe6m0LfKWySdWzgeF30e/RnxpIJgxvLzvD KzVzgiG32FddC5p0k1zJgXOwjigFXMy0t2DA0QgY9UT7nN/DQpHLKUDylXsPld1ZlInH mnYtTHVhVeRf8SYQ3Nvi7AaIdGN/QoM2RW01PtkNFHL+xsmBYC0gFt4zO5Xrp2+qo0gc 6+rR29Tfzcqbq9e4nppFFyMxQAPV11pC+gTapxomKsDRuuiGrwkjsLN+4vZqYOMhbYyg xR3FOIrLfpca69j+m/pTO/Qjo0w2rq4KX+R+BSPQ3m9/7CdVkiQ8UwzKFMQHebJyCjtD pKvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRhHb0a+iBxBZNSfoOvp8hIL6VhTL7rh5Ap2r+2MDWL1FyuG5mH0T/INIT8IKGpLfpVXAv
X-Received: by 10.14.106.131 with SMTP id m3mr522528eeg.94.1384185625495; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.175.173.95] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm64420239eem.15.2013.11.11.08.00.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:00:22 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F5164D41-0C8F-4E23-B2F8-F7CE4843131C@inf-net.nl>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet-dlep-rg] Mandatory processing TLVs by routers
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:00:36 -0000

Was Re: [manet-dlep-rg] notes DLEP meeting @ IETF88

I'll split of threads, unless one prefer mail storms without clear subjects.

Op 11 nov. 2013, om 01:55 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Item 1 and 2 seem contradictory to me. Metric values are reported via TLVs. If a given metric TLV is MANDATORY, then the router MUST process it (at least, the router MUST NOT generate an error because it exists).

This is about:

>>>>> 1. There are no metric TLVs it is MANDATORY for the Router to process.
>>>>> 2. The modem MUST report MDRT, MDRR, CDRT, and CDRR in the Peer Discovery message, and make a best effort to accurately report these metrics subsequently.

Item 2 is the first one to read, then item 1 follows. Routers may ignore all TLVs, and for example only use Neighbor Up and Neighbor Down.

Teco