IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 27 February 2017 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAEE1293E3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:21:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11-z21DaOTW1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0335E1279EB for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 25659 invoked by uid 0); 27 Feb 2017 22:21:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2017 22:21:48 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id pyMl1u00F2SSUrH01yMo4D; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:21:48 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=H5NInYoi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=n2v9WMKugxEA:10 a=Alt3Qjv6C5bQUZSMUJMA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Iv/h7lF9LZE/iGqN5pxg7NR8CxLvCZKYCUoiIrfviW4=; b=TkIMeFcv7QGFBAQ07CcZwjimN7 Ekq/gyrSr7FsxNxIrHtb8LUWzYKG7bAi5nTu6rQ3ZjAY6MBiOE1qzV3tPQzGWe8ojku+66AQtI0K6 9q1EYgWAtCnQgJwb1sLEfWW2N;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:55852 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ciTft-0005Ww-1S; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:21:45 -0700
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, 'Netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>, 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com> <20170227221434.GB68878@elstar.local>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <1de19ae0-0373-f073-9151-885b7b9b9f92@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:21:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170227221434.GB68878@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1ciTft-0005Ww-1S
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:55852
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5_SMStTwX-NP2VoGiyqTyhDxU-I>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:21:51 -0000


On 2/27/2017 5:14 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:44:06PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
>
>> 6. Revise the current NETCONF datastore concept as a protocol- and modeling
>> language-independent standard as part of the network configuration
>> framework. Use the datastore solution proposal in
>> draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores as its basis. Will be used as a
>> normative reference in protocol specifications.
> There is no point in dupliating work in WGs that have a common history
> and a common set of active contributors.

I read 6 as covering any protocol specific implications of revised data
stores, in which case it's (more) reasonable for this
discussion/work/docs to be in NetConf.

Lou

> /js
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email