IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Fri, 03 March 2017 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093FD1296D0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:05:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqqhdjJWaLZU for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61E91296CB for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:05:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1059; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488539155; x=1489748755; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rCm2X5YdzvI57kvHuy5qEGtaHNQdf3djexwUy8ZBHnM=; b=kkLtXqbGU+8jYjyE7xRF9jg0rBszJ1B2LCsRbNTCdTVtt3/usZsFnbJ0 kbG8cTePbjz58znCwIIpeXqzpFqfk0ernxRQk/ankolo/wYFcoEsCcQJG Qu8ZekJpaSvnaE4f2smyG4Plru1gohu3Q0QVUtWG8kVXRAO6wI3i3UbdB 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASAQBGTblY/4YNJK1bAxkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNQYYEQjWGRT5Mogg+CDSaFfAKCVz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEcAEBAQMBOj8FCQICAQgOAgUDHhAbFyUCBAENDYlrCLRjiwgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdBYZJhG+EdSaFHgWcKwGSKYIEiHaGLpM6AR84gQFVFYcRiUWBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,236,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="391519618"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Mar 2017 11:05:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v23B5sFW021313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:05:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:05:53 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:05:54 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
Thread-Index: AQHSkqTwCc7ORdXbRmOFzdaoTO5UHKGA3a1wgAEFUwD//+LA8IAAYTsAgAB61wCAAIyFAP//x28w
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 11:05:53 +0000
Message-ID: <0ba776220d76471abcfb1b3b9a956421@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com> <20170227221434.GB68878@elstar.local> <026f01d29273$5d57dfa0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <F1EB9C98-BB1C-410D-9D6D-1777A96148C6@nic.cz> <CABCOCHTVZxPyT_LSX2GjnNKFCz3857HAOA_GS5iTaxLejno8RQ@mail.gmail.com> <bc6813b038094a1eac1fc9df68f3205c@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <m2pohzpznf.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <e2cd792fb1734d04b5d0340617ff39e9@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <CABCOCHQ7zymX=0qtT9_ihamxDHiokkP9bE2bac-8Y=eU+bcXoQ@mail.gmail.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0DF83D7A@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com> <20170303092406.GA2790@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20170303092406.GA2790@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.232.25.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/q2p6jOTruioZtk-McepDlDkQiQ4>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 11:05:57 -0000


> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, March 3, 2017 4:24 AM
> 
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:01:10AM +0000, Alexander Clemm wrote:
> >
> > An operator doesn't want external systems to individually address every
> control plane VM.  Rather they want a YANG model for this logical+physical
> combination.  In this case each VM might use Peer (data) Mount to build a
> multi-device abstraction.  BTW: doing it this way also allows the same mounted
> YANG object data to be addressably exposed for each VM without requiring
> another YANG model to be made.
> >
> 
> My question since the very beginning is: Is the idea to run configuration editing
> transactions across mount points?

My position is that there is huge value in read only access.  I have no desire to champion edit operations. 

Eric

> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email