IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 23 March 2017 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCB3124BE8 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dkzwEmC8e8V for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3C0127843 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B4810022; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.205]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Df3Osp-rqkhx; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD77820035; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:51:59 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvz5EHdAPi-o; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A31D20031; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id EB83E3EF6257; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:03 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170323065203.GA39799@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <685B9088-7557-4C6E-9A8F-54C3208DB312@juniper.net> <7217bc23-0e1e-c250-929d-e18c3f0a800f@cisco.com> <07b601d2a197$9865d5b0$c9318110$@gmail.com> <20170321082015.GC35044@elstar.local> <0f17c698ae2645988692ba1eef007d79@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <37950223-F83B-40FD-8CA4-9A790D0A917E@nic.cz> <20170322084751.GA37843@elstar.local> <804C3246-DE92-40CD-9A46-6CC662FE9727@nic.cz> <6802426F-D189-40CD-B3AE-8B007C373528@gmail.com> <60a3f9ccb40f4f1a8a4d2a7992b6514b@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <60a3f9ccb40f4f1a8a4d2a7992b6514b@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/iIa7dwamRBqI-Wi1xvouAGQ78yE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:52:04 -0000

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:42:52AM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> > > A more detailed explanation is here (search for SSE):
> > >
> > > https://www.infoq.com/articles/websocket-and-http2-coexist
> > 
> > To the question asked by Juergen. Is this reason enough for us to separate
> > notifications for RESTCONF to be split from RESTCONF itself?
> 
> Notifications have never been delivered over RESTCONF.  RESTCONF is a just a way to signal / establish the relationship so that HTTP/ TCP can be used.
>

Would this not be true for all of RESTCONF? To me, it seems section 6
of RFC 8040 (aka RESTCONF) defines how notifications are handled.

> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif proposes a mechanism which works with HTTP2.  This mechanism could be considered by a future RESTCONF revision should people want to re-open that newly minted RFC.
> 
> In either case, we should care about this in our charter. The question is how prescriptive do we want our charter to be in defining the resulting structure of new/potentially adopted drafts.

I think we need to prevent a babel tower of protocol variants.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email