IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 27 February 2017 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2B412944E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g943gQwvvhaG for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 09118129448 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4371 invoked by uid 0); 27 Feb 2017 23:03:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2017 23:03:32 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id pz3V1u0042SSUrH01z3Y2h; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:03:32 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GtPRpCFC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=n2v9WMKugxEA:10 a=MGuAIL07mmmDgyJYIMAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9OHrt0TPKm+IvBsUuNo94lnEDfwRF7xx5IpwHmhcyX4=; b=w8kV+j6sDwYUWSnmnuFwfSCQXA g6ljHPsYdiTH9SY0NVCqPJbOOJir6Sq+uS1X29sNYShqB09ABlxkZJRqug4WXR6cB7eHAGAnFAiMn lzSL4NFOa8n4ED4HJ/LqgYvY2;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:57134 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ciUKG-00047I-SZ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:03:28 -0700
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, 'Netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>, 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com> <20170227221434.GB68878@elstar.local> <1de19ae0-0373-f073-9151-885b7b9b9f92@labn.net> <20170227222425.GD68878@elstar.local>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <ab895626-c649-cea4-dd69-7bc6af17b08c@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:03:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170227222425.GD68878@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1ciUKG-00047I-SZ
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:57134
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/miioxbZYZx6sJ8dm-uZN9MGzyIc>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:03:38 -0000


On 2/27/2017 5:24 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:21:43PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>>
>> On 2/27/2017 5:14 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:44:06PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
>>>
>>>> 6. Revise the current NETCONF datastore concept as a protocol- and modeling
>>>> language-independent standard as part of the network configuration
>>>> framework. Use the datastore solution proposal in
>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores as its basis. Will be used as a
>>>> normative reference in protocol specifications.
>>> There is no point in dupliating work in WGs that have a common history
>>> and a common set of active contributors.
>> I read 6 as covering any protocol specific implications of revised data
>> stores, in which case it's (more) reasonable for this
>> discussion/work/docs to be in NetConf.
> This is not my reading of this text. Obviously, the text needs
> clarification to make the intention clear.

Fair enough -- I do agree that it work should not be duplicated across WGs.

Lou
> /js
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email