IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 28 February 2017 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8175129644 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:02:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3PMb15p-rzx for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E96129647 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u108so13107274wrb.3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BmU6j21rBx/BsnIlbxAUaVPjLecMDJCaNkK/5xBg+Bo=; b=vX+v3QTdVAhuH0tIZVRWQKR3JW+7gmHZ61J2gkr4Y7jLVoPsxzkgoalFhBIcaHUqpx AuzbnbiLCOvHuDj0bahUgJGAxtQidV1QTm6WMiJRRja+rzDXwMh2MNNsh/Snb+0iOJMc RrKgvfHNwPbAlWqRTnipYjTVmsvuZyIOVcYdEXx0/0J/IeZEOoIMIaHaWiPrZ4gLBYs9 2DyDbho8jgp9FhXSZv4IYD9f/xx3nR2ZYWuqbKEEB+Tx02Z7PKILVGTFCt9OJBYSbSJK s1vPuQxwWHzm9mEB7RekPwKJKwZAZd6JVLipeWrvS+YfXc0Ln6SLbU9slh9aFGFnweDJ laSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BmU6j21rBx/BsnIlbxAUaVPjLecMDJCaNkK/5xBg+Bo=; b=T0bijqk7DQyPChf7xBtHahZUdR3yZMIxUbn4VUrMeXhKIkPHugPsNeirCkr5Q8kqGp 1X+yAmiIRsYopYYMchhZ+Kr0tz+YpTkXKYVvXWkIu6ZceLAa8wefZ4Z2Q4sCm4hEZZRZ AOyNxFgX4ApUEFfjMHEKBzFP3XoAM4K5+Kk94Z5mK7PuH43Z+VhjN2pzaDiGcI+iFCq7 XMbZPR7X3NGSIpFOoZ2Gm9zTzl/2pHd7PrxCOUcu8H+BYcY29XLefihhbSBNEH1sbv7B 1vTO/kY/DQP1NaZWO7EJ80Ece8yj7cbFu/8yPT7cee9Hnu8qb0Od6nrSqLQqWUwOH0Md sHYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mkJxCyAtIpi6jK64hfxtkdAXm7c4jjQIAKmVI43EcO6xkV6xgCGNpVWLm4wkO70l3Rv7jPm/WZNJmcsw==
X-Received: by 10.223.129.183 with SMTP id 52mr3510814wra.88.1488301320055; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:02:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.165.154 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:01:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com>
References: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:01:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTFi55qg7F5LMVUcEkuwtvsT6+mDJ=qPZ_H=rA1phdyAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148dd42804d1605499a27e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/7NKDXPLOB2oHDGxcSePJxcAMugs>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:02:06 -0000

>
> ....
>
> Sep 2017          WGLC for NETCONF and RESTCONF bis documents
>
> Oct 2017          Submit to NETCONF and RESTCONF bis documents AD/IESG for
> consideration as Proposed Standard
>
>
>
>


I am opposed to creating new versions of NETCONF or RESTCONF at this time.
I do not see anything in the charter that cannot be defined in RFCs that
update (not obsolete)
the existing protocols.  Both are designed to allow new functionality to be
added and advertised as capabilities.


Andy

_______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email