IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 01 March 2017 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4DE129961 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:33:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vcJrmLrupzwo for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B340912995B for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=rWdVL/iJQ1STlFNwlSzajWM49ZeFq6kzFAoe1Syc9qw=; b=LjllliTx15dhPjKjMu3+whhxYo30oo1SIeKGYYO5bEGHwCfNAWXW3lcdgyKQyGETzwGogrPWVAl+bXLayjEWn90/qLXJOAnU5wdaPkn2jraTip2oJTkLIClFabv9drTJk6ctrjgem/+50F1iyYD0Snyqcta9dnlxCj4+nRk2K4Y=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.2; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:33:11 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.011; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:33:11 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
Thread-Index: AdKROeE3Cc7ORdXbRmOFzdaoTO5UHAADP7YAAEs8mKAAC1OrgA==
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:33:10 +0000
Message-ID: <AF3B909F-E330-409E-AD0F-A4617B023514@juniper.net>
References: <014101d2913a$3db72870$b9257950$@gmail.com> <20170227221434.GB68878@elstar.local> <026f01d29273$5d57dfa0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <026f01d29273$5d57dfa0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
authentication-results: btconnect.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;btconnect.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 254ee813-febd-4168-58aa-08d460e22dd7
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1442; 7:VvYPwJTftHPcWWShZgyj4lmiFzly/fCnYfNnRJAtez0rF45Kh5PiAu0znfo6OpOZOT0R072Rl029KVxz/n06GCLW2eaN8Oxg5y2EVtXsURWf0WhbSm0xK7nkrFyFklylB1diJ7KEz0jZUSrO35iz+RE02Nw0PqjS7iikQ2ci1HqtIhfwNLb6Z6sV03jFyHqAbzoj+54piTquXpANjt9+hpuypaLFgtSGR5RoZOoGlUYNAx6Wvm+VzETONOoyR+3vanepsLvh1sHszFK7wglrRX+BFTkADFnNEQGSnT064GTzmiTgk37GnIzNNuWToDzjAakML01WGgt48CXfDpo7qQ==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB14424C31929300C8B5D33B28A5290@BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-forefront-prvs: 0233768B38
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(51444003)(38730400002)(6512007)(4001350100001)(86362001)(189998001)(39060400002)(54356999)(50986999)(53936002)(66066001)(81166006)(81156014)(5660300001)(8936002)(76176999)(229853002)(8676002)(25786008)(82746002)(305945005)(3660700001)(2900100001)(7736002)(36756003)(2906002)(122556002)(6246003)(83506001)(92566002)(99286003)(3280700002)(8666007)(77096006)(2950100002)(6116002)(6506006)(33656002)(83716003)(6486002)(3846002)(102836003)(4326008)(6436002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D0858C2C265ABA4BBFCC2D9E88122350@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2017 20:33:10.8108 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1442
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/I3c3WPNtm6_6oJB_CxeO4H1LRPc>
Cc: 'Netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Charter Proposal for NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:33:16 -0000

> I am not sure what you are proposing;  Currently, datastores are poorly
> described in RFC6241 and RFC7950 and the publication of another incomplete
> description in the shape of draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores will
> likely make things worse.

That's an unfair characterization.  The plan is for revised-datastores to
be a complete definition, as I think you'll appreciate when its update is
posted in a couple weeks.


> I see a need for a datastores RFC, probably separate from the current
> specifications, and do see the NETCONF WG as better placed to do it.

Agree that a separate RFC is needed.  Disagree that NETCONF WG is the
better WG for it, for reasons mentioned by Rob.


> I think that the rush to get draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores
> out is militating against the long term health of NETCONF.

Rush?  It's been almost a full two years since we started the opstate
discussions.  Admittedly, it mostly occurred on the NETMOD list, maybe
you missed it?


Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email