IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01

Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net> Fri, 15 March 2013 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <koen.vos@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5393121F88EA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBwxfIrQ+ZUt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-sn2-obe.outbound.o365filtering.com (na01-sn2-obe.ptr.o365filtering.com [157.55.158.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D58021F88D8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2SR01CA103.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com (10.255.93.148) by BY2SR01MB608.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com (10.255.93.167) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.5; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:42 +0000
Received: from BY1FFOFD002.ffo.gbl (64.4.22.88) by BY2SR01CA103.outlook.office365.com (10.255.93.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.658.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:42 +0000
Received: from hybrid.exchange.microsoft.com (131.107.1.27) by BY1FFOFD002.mail.o365filtering.com (10.1.16.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:41 +0000
Received: from DFM-TK5MBX15-07.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.109.46) by DF-G14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.1; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:20 -0700
Received: from DFM-CO1MBX15-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.59.247.79) by DFM-TK5MBX15-07.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.109.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.14; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:19 -0700
Received: from DFM-CO1MBX15-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.59.247.11) by DFM-CO1MBX15-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.59.247.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.25; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:11 -0700
Received: from DFM-CO1MBX15-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([157.59.247.11]) by DFM-CO1MBX15-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.5.131]) with mapi id 15.00.0620.020; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:34:11 -0700
From: Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net>
To: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01
Thread-Index: AQHOIYQ1+zdMWf7pVEmNxXCLOF5pPpim/3BI
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:10 +0000
Message-ID: <80aba69060a14004acfebca95b1ddf7a@DFM-CO1MBX15-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338D2B178@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <51431729.10608@nostrum.com>, <CAErhfrwOEaUYNH-jW0-4HR9+5EnDSim8XDHdsx0xNnUUO35znA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErhfrwOEaUYNH-jW0-4HR9+5EnDSim8XDHdsx0xNnUUO35znA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.13]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_80aba69060a14004acfebca95b1ddf7aDFMCO1MBX1504exchangeco_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.1.27; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(377454001)(24454001)(189002)(199002)(59766001)(56776001)(54316002)(69226001)(16236675001)(47976001)(66066001)(49866001)(44976002)(80022001)(74662001)(77982001)(50986001)(20776003)(46102001)(65816001)(53806001)(31966008)(512954001)(5343655001)(16406001)(51856001)(56816002)(4396001)(79102001)(74502001)(5343635001)(33646001)(47446002)(876001)(54356001)(63696002)(47736001)(76482001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2SR01MB608; H:hybrid.exchange.microsoft.com; RD:mail7.exchange.microsoft.com; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 078693968A
X-OriginatorOrg: msft.ccsctp.net
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:46 -0000

Xavier Marjou wrote:
> Again, this threads deals with interoperability (i.e. communications between a WebRTC device and a non-WebRTC device).

Given that it's currently impossible to connect to a mobile phone in a legacy network without transcoding, could you tell us a bit about Orange/3GPP's plans to provide the kind of interop you describe?  If those plans  don't exist, how could this thread (or the IETF) be dealing with such interoperability?

koen.


________________________________
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Xavier Marjou
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 6:51 AM
To: Adam Roach
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01


Again, this threads deals with interoperability (i.e. communications between a WebRTC device and a non-WebRTC device).
Non-WebRTC devices mean nearly all of existing phones in the world; they are already deployed and there's no way to upgrade them all with OPUS on them.

Xavier

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com<mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:

I don't think this points to a need to push AMR into the web browsers, mind you. To take Justin's earlier point a few steps further: if we're going on number of shipping units, the mere existence of Chrome and Firefox's WebRTC implementation means that the number of deployed Opus codecs far overwhelms the number of deployed AMR codecs. Appeals to the size of codec deployment would more reasonably reach the conclusion that Opus should be MTI for the next 3GPP release. ;-)

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email