Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01

Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca> Wed, 06 March 2013 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CAB21F8C32 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.507, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yc-GoZ1zPuwa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s30.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s30.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EB321F8AF4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP76 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s30.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:32 -0800
X-EIP: [bbM+MlwY2vDWbVtekqvfOZ8Qez7gQ+ZF]
X-Originating-Email: [coverdale@sympatico.ca]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP76DCE1745B6A25BFCC3787D0E40@phx.gbl>
Received: from PaulNewPC ([70.54.90.206]) by BLU0-SMTP76.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:10:29 -0800
From: Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <E8F5F2C7B2623641BD9ABF0B622D726D0F68869E@xmb-rcd-x11.cisco.com> <5135DA46.7050909@ericsson.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7623B7EF4@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7623B7EF4@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:10:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHOGZadQwWRkr2Pv0KZo1p0ebE2i5iXXXaQgAGHdTA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2013 17:10:29.0600 (UTC) FILETIME=[80EC3E00:01CE1A8D]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:10:37 -0000

Yes, draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01 provides a proposal for
additional text to be added to draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-01, which is an
rtcweb milestone supposed to be already completed. So it's not unreasonable
to have some discussion on the topic.

...Paul

>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 5:04 AM
>To: stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com; rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-
>codecs-for-interop-01
>
>Hi,
>
>Stefan Håkansson wrote:
>>
>>On 2013-03-04 23:31, Espen Berger (espeberg) wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to request agenda time for:
>>>
>>> draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01
>>>
>>> The document  presents use-cases underlining why WebRTC needs AMR-
>>WB,
>>>   AMR and G.722 as additional relevant voice codecs to satisfactorily
>>> ensure interoperability with existing systems.
>>
>>I agree to that we should discuss the subject of additional codecs.
>>
>
>This is a controversial topic, but I agree it would deserve some
>discussion to try to bring it to a closure.
>
>Markus