Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Wed, 13 March 2013 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E71A21F8E0C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUNtTVdLzIUm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5581221F86EC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.40.23] (h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net [87.96.134.129]) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C368393DE3E; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:38:19 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4838ECE4-51C5-4AF3-8E7B-687599231E64"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <514087BA.7000709@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:37:58 +0100
Message-Id: <DE4BEEA4-B4B0-4342-A160-DAAACB6764DE@edvina.net>
References: <E8F5F2C7B2623641BD9ABF0B622D726D0F68869E@xmb-rcd-x11.cisco.com> <CA+9kkMA7x18x3rD9PoPx-rA+4uz7ome3LjQ7sOWHDptz0zJX6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrx24SR5zwH3oHQi_PhFkfQjCmbMuatwEw2kjJ184MiUpw@mail.gmail.com> <514087BA.7000709@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-marjou-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-01
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:38:39 -0000

13 mar 2013 kl. 15:05 skrev Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>no>:

>> - The co-authors want to underline that non-WebRTC voice endpoints usually use one of the following codecs: AMR, AMR-WB or G.722, which will result in massive transcoding when there will be communications between WebRTC endpoints and non-WebRTC endpoints.
>> 
I have a large amount of SIP phones on my desk, none which support AMR and/or AMR-WB. I had to pay extra for AMR in a SIP phone for my iPhone.

I don't agree with the standpoint that AMR is implemented on a majority of traditional non-WebRTC endpoints.

/O