IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D31A0089 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:10:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NYnHCuv_7Nlc for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x235.google.com (mail-pb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97B1A0079 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id rp16so3807268pbb.12 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:10:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Yip5oewgwFxJblCHMwH5mDqg4qhX0Z0KQDbDWHyJZx8=; b=RscGbb9kJa8zzqpnJpYox2j6+CPYWapNpYeJZ/liGACa3nWGgdF8o7Lit0Be8x0jpX q3p8FVYYM/wCU9O505RIvZGaWTBR8NDkBLm679CySkzl02M1r/jrA8zKAJMRnDeetat0 E3CaGZrtBE7wiKvMEUi0lWdS5JRNJzfCHsefOvmQPyptmHUgU8etx5ISATyjVC6Qi79s 44ocbl/flZ8uZVUgDltGijfFPWW48suLqpB4YhHhH92renxlM31VT3JAdqGSaTVT4nWV CAuG3ZrDQGuZRQcPwsLYai4HmpLoOmDooMVAD/z/78uaANYRSUGrYut+ZQsJMVXsd4JJ EPIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.26.15 with SMTP id h15mr153187pag.24.1393855843428; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.1.70 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:10:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com> <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:10:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFFjW4jCueZSV5PQ=EvgCLugsW15eu669ZHAvstYdX29u5DRJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec529944b6a6e8204f3b45a6c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/4McmZR5B8wL_CyEUfYNT21VjHC4
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:10:51 -0000

On 3 March 2014 14:54, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Lightweight 4over6 provides a solution for a hub-and-spoke softwire
> architecture only,
> > where the AFTR maintains (softwire) state for each subscriber. A means
> for
> > optmizing the amount of such state, as well as the option of meshed IPv4
> >
> > connectivity between subscribers, are features of the [
> > I-D.ietf-softwire-map] solution.
>
> This sounds like a marketing change, not an ICMP change.   Can you explain
> what this has to do with ICMP?
>
>
>From a previous mail (that you perhaps missed):
Woj> the stated characterisation of map isn't quite right; MAP does not
force the use of mesh mode, nor is mesh mode its defining characteristic.
The characterisation should be restated as...

Like others, please treat it like a WG LC comment.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email