IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444181A0194 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:42:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjG03dDuDMU2 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA601A0188 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBU47002; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:42:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:41:12 +0000
Received: from SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.197) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:41:43 +0000
Received: from szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.77]) by SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.197]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:41:06 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
Thread-Index: Ac8y1ZruItgCRoo5SUqGBMiQCTiWB///lAwAgAgI/YCAAAHpgIAE9jur
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:41:05 +0000
Message-ID: <E7CDC345-4601-43C0-BB6D-2B11B50725E5@huawei.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com>, <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E7CDC345460143C0BB6D2B11B50725E5huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/smUAJi26unFy4SIKzwM_9hvPAwI
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:42:12 -0000

Dear all,

Sorry I don't agree the following changes Woj proposed, same reason as Ted mentioned below.


Thank you,
Tina

On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:55 AM, "Ted Lemon" <ted.lemon@nominum.com<mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com>> wrote:

On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:wdec.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Lightweight 4over6 provides a solution for a hub-and-spoke softwire architecture only,
where the AFTR maintains (softwire) state for each subscriber. A means for
optmizing the amount of such state, as well as the option of meshed IPv4

connectivity between subscribers, are features of the [
I-D.ietf-softwire-map] solution.

This sounds like a marketing change, not an ICMP change.   Can you explain what this has to do with ICMP?

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email