IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E421A0130 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:02:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGfOSbyFhB_x for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF8E1A0112 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-afd3.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.175.211]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MX1hk-1WfUrt0IPU-00VykA for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:02:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFFjW4hp5ju=5ZKD+BqYdBZ3rMbA=r9bcE8Wm+b2orjVJOpFtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:02:15 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A14A1137-4DBB-4C4D-B005-ACC893C14BCE@gmx.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <EBAECD54-9E78-4B07-BC8F-032B585AE0EE@gmail.com> <CAFFjW4hEBF3ZTnGXv+0ncTb981Mr_mdMW04EW=ZqBWFSRE9Q-Q@mail.gmail.com> <530D3EEC.8040201@ericsson.com> <CAFFjW4hp5ju=5ZKD+BqYdBZ3rMbA=r9bcE8Wm+b2orjVJOpFtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x7z+OtPLrolvOditZCmF7JtkzsFXBszN+eySUmyZoRmVRZM25mK Ez4zuZsffrowChoSIyQD81SkyJLSNSe32bj+rJS01UbjeGPySZBdHx90zR4pPqx+Jl33Euv 68mU//Bo6Us8DaIX3aiCIpv+a+6vDgkHFWLJSvC/aIugcSUW8UtvtWbDIg6M3C7c+IjMV7U n5+n8F3R+xBUUKpl3ARmQ==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/944cH8WEaIznFfp3kFbr4nDRx9M
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:02:22 -0000

> 
> There is a difference: Here I'm pointing out that IPinIP dataplane + ICMP wise there should be no difference between lw46 and MAP-E, and in effect a MAP BR or lw46 AFTR implementation of these would be no different. There is no talk of provisioning.
> uCPE attempts to bring in all mechanisms, also beyond -E and lw46, + their various provisioning options for a single CPE. 
> 

[ian] To be clear about where (I think) we are with this - the data plane behaviour between MAP-E & lw4o6 are the same, the only thing that we need to get agreement on is the wording that’s used to describe it.

Is that your understanding as well?

Cheers,
Ian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email