Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

On 04/03/2014 9:47 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 03/04/2014 04:54 AM, Ian Farrer wrote:
>> This could certainly save a spending the rest of the week
>> micro-editing wording, so I’d be happy with it.
>>
>> An extremely tentative further suggestion:
>>
>> Should there be a draft which discusses the available softwire
>> solutions more throughly (we would tackle this only after we’ve got
>> the WGCLs completed, so there’s something to actually compare)?
>>
>> A basket of vipers, I’m sure, but it wold give somewhere for a much
>> more complete analysis of the pros and cons rather than a line and a
>> half of analysis in the technology specific drafts.
>
> I think could be an useful effort but I do think that writing an
> objective document is going to be extremely hard. I think we will have
> problems even agreeing on the axes of comparison, let alone the
> evaluation of the solutions along these axes.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
I'd be willing to tackle an initial version as an intellectual exercise.

Tom Taylor