IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4943A1A0666 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:26:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PpYygbnN2R38 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BE91A065C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jt11so5079431pbb.0 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 02:26:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=s/F7INbhoK9S44V87dp8/lQB/nZGCrjS6l9I1aDsXAc=; b=ZkUMUXuRgi7viqDZh+YJwU4gGdHBWHGygf/b1e4FmCij6Sgb9XGoSj/fTaxOCq30/v 8/EqOedmsKgotF9LzV9TenNsE91wHB+/jGMFKNwboef80bUVYXD8LEFRCa1ak9M3Q1ry GP+jFi4K102ctZ612fL9PuCMLWrwFcvzhtEz2BUZsOcvrDWb9LfFYXjMgS8FKQbzoaFr HR0b8P2LppvFapbpvrY1HNJ/rZs7rZB7v0H24iTbH0joV8QywV68954nnX00DBlKkX2z uN2HFB/uRSK5Xtke130tEdIStZc6v4BTGXTVULJD0eoyWNxiPdJ5gWnh/BDBZAeLpymz PToA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.67.5.233 with SMTP id cp9mr4913800pad.147.1393928809158; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 02:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.1.70 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:26:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FED39AC2-9572-4057-904D-537C79D34D1D@nominum.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com> <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com> <CAFFjW4jCueZSV5PQ=EvgCLugsW15eu669ZHAvstYdX29u5DRJw@mail.gmail.com> <8F3E2C06-4FB4-488D-AC52-FF597060B63D@nominum.com> <CAFFjW4jROzB_KEyoE7-8TXF2oqCZ+0f0n5zVzJrw+TOQg8Cxwg@mail.gmail.com> <04B66292-1A04-4DE9-BAE8-C3551FD518BD@nominum.com> <3ED101B2-F3BD-4504-BEE4-2E23CE08F019@employees.org> <C3BC7114-FC3F-41B8-84C1-8CDAF824FCEB@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4hDnOW28HikyYRVHoztrGvfzcETzEybbDCH_oydQmX=eQ@mail.gmail.com> <FED39AC2-9572-4057-904D-537C79D34D1D@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:26:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFFjW4ik952duWhaS4TeebX75WtCNcysa8NcLTSLy77yfMfUxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b15b1e5831b3804f3c557bd"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/WF58AaSjc87ZrrhdbXH5TmF8290
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:26:55 -0000

I was speaking as a WG participant, and I was referring to my proposal made
in that capacity. Furthermore, there is nothing factually wrong with what I
said, nor you appear to question that. The text that you oddly claim will
take years to resolve,  took 5 mins to agree with Ian (yesterday). Perhaps
it's not your intent, but you're actually flaming the flames here...




On 4 March 2014 11:18, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, but I'll insist for a number of reasons:
>
> Woj, can we please not speak in terms of "insisting"?   You are a working
> group participant.   If you have a technical issue _which would prevent the
> standard from functioning_ then you do have some degree of veto power, but
> this point doesn't rise to that level.
>
> The text here only functions to explain to a person who is not familiar
> with either draft which draft they should implement.   In that unlikely
> scenario, the text as written does not give sufficient guidance.   In order
> to meet that need, the text would have to be more like what Ian is
> describing.
>
> So if that is in fact the use case you are shooting for, I think you
> should work with Ian on the draft he's proposed.   There is no way to get
> that by wordsmithing this text.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email