IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A311A06F0 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3arXisMgUn1z for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FB81A058E for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p61so1483723wes.25 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:17:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=CCAVVenZGptQwZuQC2d3LnR/zwwFaziikhqOu3Wg9xo=; b=HSQ9506n8j3jzTb9VscPgl8rE4FMTP8l9+MWKklvxSdiWjtUvQWosB3ZBuOzGRIyFA Sa+t1UsHrdIedBsPFJeGyli98SztlEHyN3rdIMuw2b1WNlI8HVEhk5CnMETKJdwubII4 MnyfBPPfQD+ptI7qdEIWGmyD6nm89Ntj//wSJhpyr6rM6o09SWo0T/tqbGq/+2ItD3LC fuaTy6nMuuA/OfJa0xA0mzRR9DWWbHhFvnCBxmXgLUgh1C4DLwp0MXUXg2P+jQaVh5ii OYw0yjdyCHc9VIZf2C+NgTg7JRH5ueJ8/z2VDnUOxXGJkYbVt66gScvb0XxdIvYAzcA4 AMZQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.174.4 with SMTP id bo4mr2411335wjc.62.1394036263919; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:9284:dff:fef3:d346]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uq2sm2321970wjc.5.2014.03.05.08.17.42 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-36--882770342"
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:17:37 +0000
Message-Id: <0080BF40-2A61-4298-8978-9DA11C1D5820@gmail.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/63M8wctHVeDxYwmB_kMtBZBHURI
Cc: Softwires-wg WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:17:51 -0000

Woj,

I don't think map is more optimized than lw4over6 when IPv4 and IPv6 are totally decoupled (which is lw4over6 designed to deal with). I would prefer to follow Ole's suggestion at this point, i.e. remove this text.

Best Regards,
Qi


On 2014-3-3, at 下午1:47, Wojciech Dec wrote:

> 
> Current text in Section 1 reads:
> 
> Lightweight 4over6 provides a solution for a hub-and-spoke softwire
>    architecture only.  It does not offer direct, meshed IPv4
>    connectivity between subscribers without packets traversing the AFTR.
>    If this type of meshed interconnectivity is required,
>    [I-D.ietf-softwire-map] provides a suitable solution.
>  
> Propose changing the above to:
> 
> Lightweight 4over6 provides a solution for a hub-and-spoke softwire architecture only, 
> where the AFTR maintains (softwire) state for each subscriber. A means for 
> optmizing the amount of such state, as well as the option of meshed IPv4 
> 
> connectivity between subscribers, are features of the [I-D.ietf-softwire-map] solution.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Wojciech.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email