IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C41A02F7 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:40:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHG33wFTANJk for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7219B1A0434 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([24.40.56.115]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.119916704; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:40:18 -0700
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.7.116]) by PACDCEXHUB02.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::492e:3fa1:c2ad:e04e%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:40:18 -0500
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPOUoD6MVFSuL800+A+7mLaV4tIA==
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:42:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CF3E391C.3BA92%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <78CE37BA-11FB-4AE4-9D49-A3053616A31A@gmx.com> <53173611.5070208@viagenie.ca> <4255E91E-B1F0-4FE0-9A86-171922C7BC43@gmx.com> <6BE4C1C1-17D6-44B6-A9FC-F270D29AA0B0@employees.org> <F946C230-B91C-4463-823B-C3FB3B0577F2@gmx.com> <98DA6B17-C07E-40B8-AABE-8A4D0D5F687A@employees.org> <C5A90AEF-B379-4F72-B5A5-DB7B4B3ECB65@gmx.com> <22664634-0F04-493E-A010-A59A4E3CEBE7@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <22664634-0F04-493E-A010-A59A4E3CEBE7@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [68.87.16.247]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3476961617_77395"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/Q2xML8iQnzDMHCddV-bSowq4VzI
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:40:48 -0000

Ole, 

A clarification question. Do you suggest to use S46 Rule Option?

Thanks,
Yiu

On 3/6/14, 1:37 PM, "Ole Troan" <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

>Ian,
>
>> It really depends on what you mean by 'the wheel' in this contextŠ
>> 
>> But, as a proposal, if we extend (and maybe rename)
>>OPTION_L46_IPV4ADDRESS with new fields for prefix6-len and ipv6-prefixes
>>to be used for a LPM, would this meet your definition of a wheel?
>
>pretty much. my point was that we use the same wheel if we can.
>if you have invented a better wheel, then I would like to use it in MAP-E
>as well.
>
>cheers,
>Ole
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email