IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 04 March 2014 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6934D1A0457 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUKyy1O17qpa for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69F91A0451 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AA8602F; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:42:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=selector1; bh=s0z6Rpk+xzp3oRjNQWhh8 +gvi4M=; b=JVAnsqt9AkCnkpcaVTcTgnKvoK3qUALJjWAVevsHDPgi3xJdjvVIf GkuWvdhQmJaYiQrOcrq1r4J+3VCAJMJ1lPqRX+cZlNjAXRT7WOgvhtq0azfpwkv/ Iwy9EZEGK3XMUmreubcKYRFeVo8i9MMocEvbAwIgk/c0C/gT3rUZ78=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=ciludD1r2LAZ21W JYpDMalTNTnUL7RP7iIzKm5N54zF2gQbc7LXNsrSkk/zBcff4OLNV5pGMcXp6pF7 t39ES+iGTOgLSqwUi5u9IYfr2FfHShmP77VUsk8iQK4ltkKLneDY5DivHKsWKbsX 0WdRUKB64UrHRdIuA/CtF6VY9z/E=
Received: from dhcp-10-61-104-249.cisco.com (173-38-208-169.cisco.com [173.38.208.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C0B15FE7; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BE91A845-7F66-4B3F-AA97-4251A950ED09"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <04B66292-1A04-4DE9-BAE8-C3551FD518BD@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:42:22 +0000
Message-Id: <3ED101B2-F3BD-4504-BEE4-2E23CE08F019@employees.org>
References: <20140211075445.17615.61208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FD878467-904B-4441-95B4-11D4461A612E@employees.org> <CF237FDE.AACEB%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4jOBfvnqCV4UH8qt0HA5zZ-35f+q5ZepzjnwGX5_Oj9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <8A1B81989BCFAE44A22B2B86BF2B76318A2CDB8ED2@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CAFFjW4iP2KqNJFtJPr5rp0tzRwM5TPjaqiSP5r13JqbX46ao7w@mail.gmail.com> <CD1D4FF6-9509-43B4-AFC4-4F1AF99D0C4D@gmx.com> <CAFFjW4ibkj_xpTuXrbYjxkdxD=+qNzapCGPHJwXsZ-k0ZvGg-g@mail.gmail.com> <CF335888.AE89D%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4hv5WBiqyw9jM+ZoLMGR5k49pjKXG0epnhrsOGoBBKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4gyvcBTBDjE8nzGbPz8BcHUasHizzzry0cRF+J2T82uSQ@mail.gmail.com> <AD73A61E-1C8D-4C55-9E24-9CBFC3D44374@nominum.com> <CAFFjW4jCueZSV5PQ=EvgCLugsW15eu669ZHAvstYdX29u5DRJw@mail.gmail.com> <8F3E2C06-4FB4-488D-AC52-FF597060B63D@nominum.com> <CAFFjW4jROzB_KEyoE7-8TXF2oqCZ+0f0n5zVzJrw+TOQg8Cxwg@mail.gmail.com> <04B66292-1A04-4DE9-BAE8-C3551FD518BD@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/Mx7Y1AMsE5v04I26UGaGxYJbXYI
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-06.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:42:25 -0000

> If, as you say, Ian is happy to make the change that you've proposed, then I have no problem with that.   However, let's not needlessly delay both of these drafts arguing about marketing boilerplate.   The text as written is not a sufficiently glowing recommendation of MAP, but it doesn't need to be, for two reasons.   First, this is not a draft about MAP.   Secondly, everybody already knows what they intend to implement anyway, so getting this text exactly perfect will make not one iota of difference in regards to who implements what.

I have had success in the past by removing contentious text. I think that could work here, just remove this paragraph:

"It does not offer direct, meshed IPv4 connectivity between subscribers without packets traversing the AFTR.
If this type of meshed interconnectivity is required, [I-D.ietf-softwire-map] provides a suitable solution."

or alternatively, the last sentence.

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email