IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 20 August 2016 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B138812D190 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.183
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5=0.001, RDNS_NONE=1.274, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id abPNs3lYq20U for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (unknown [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270F9128874 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7KIVe7W027909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:31:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1471717901; bh=0xU4WHIMIhgNE8BZPNxh+moJDKGDzS4dWQf0QdVqDiM=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=qjnf/g4zmXYmigSIFNwyhjsBmsqfr6gM4X77xXTPCyzPuw/ss1TNzh/lxoT4iil57 EUVZ9tMU2S4dRIkbRVrloe9n/UaKvhcq2HRbUH1Qpwanfv+U7Mpn23GlygQdGXSSvT 3LwYvqMxMhr2v+g25IlXrQ2VGmbV9XKJM46S21n8=
To: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D9E1B04E-EE62-44AD-B98E-05A264FD044C@vigilsec.com> <2D7E9FF7-6121-4E0C-BBCA-FD730F252713@brianrosen.net> <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net> <CAOPrzE0KKxVUBwczqP7xrJ6BJHnjHu0D+f=KpqkPnHLsQorXAA@mail.gmail.com> <4cd5cefb-59a1-f8d8-5bcd-e49cdbad2132@dcrocker.net> <437A953E-7F03-4FD8-B360-40C82D194DCB@att.com> <b8be3b84-4296-95a2-0058-3e5e2d633507@yaanatech.com> <a246b6eb-63f7-328b-80e6-4081460d3642@yaanatech.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836563F625B9A@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <d065897d-f748-c15d-cbcb-74881e99a01c@alum.mit.edu> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836563F6262E1@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <85441df1-bd5c-3227-be9d-544db99c0029@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:31:16 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836563F6262E1@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/-17rCSNXFuy66YlI_-dNINk_5O0>
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:31:35 -0000

On 8/20/2016 8:41 AM, DOLLY, MARTIN C wrote:
> Being it is joint effort of ATIS and SIP Forum, if you are a member of either, yes. SIP Forum is quite open. But documents are about to be updated.


Martin,

Unless i'm misunderstanding, that actually means no, they are not 
publicly available?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email