IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] JWT/JSON (was - Re: Review of: draft-ietf-stir-passport-05)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 05 August 2016 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0648612B030 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNkCt1t7zrYf for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (unknown [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162FD12B01B for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u75KBFhX015892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:11:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1470427876; bh=5XafI43HmGJygrnBMPxKBn/MfI+NT4vh5Mh0CTb7Ejg=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QBpsvZedqkC7fw/rje/QXVFULMAxC1V85oenYOsuA6OTtKVBh1P/1XWyxpPhSd99t CBuQ+cVTHWRRkVHuzlXaa1ExzqElBCK3bS6m9nj6FXrPgnZI1Qj8ECl2+YEwc46298 M2ezztEdD4YoWhAJ5NiR9Im/Xde2DEPm6PX9dv5A=
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D3C152B2.1A69BA%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <b096b541-c8af-9617-c9d7-5a1beb5230e8@dcrocker.net> <D3C16040.1A6A09%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <d66d91f0-9ea2-6295-e749-e48ea37b4892@dcrocker.net> <cfd714ce-6145-1b60-aca2-ae702a8c133d@dcrocker.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4771FF73@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <5fdf4ad3-1528-3d79-6bdb-b5eb350e5c2a@alum.mit.edu> <dbb24381-55fd-fa64-d32b-fcc50265ccab@dcrocker.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B47723C55@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <503738d8-c166-dfc1-d153-338d56b844c1@dcrocker.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BBB1D69@ESESSMB208.ericsson.se>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <cc4b84d2-afc9-cd70-af09-909cdc6c8ef2@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:10:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BBB1D69@ESESSMB208.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/zCLebHp_WCi8SOYaAIwjGUCCU48>
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] JWT/JSON (was - Re: Review of: draft-ietf-stir-passport-05)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 20:11:21 -0000

On 8/5/2016 1:03 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> I don't know whether the WG has yet decided whether there will be
> options and alternatives (i.e. whether sending of claims/headers will be
> mandatory, optional or forbidden) - so we don't yet know whether there
> will be an "if" :)
>
> But, if there will be an "if", 4424bis needs to describe how to
> correctly handle the different options and alternatives.


Thanks for nicely introducing an underlying question I have about the 
specs:  They were submitted for last call but clearly aren't yet 
finished.  What's up with that?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email