IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Setting Direction for the STIR WG Last Call

Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> Thu, 18 August 2016 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <br@brianrosen.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C7B12D60D for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dk1OOShBEhnc for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com (mail-ua0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5411612D5B9 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k90so5887071uak.1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AAGUwBLGfo6yWQC5meFKxNX183kSvTLH8FlPaYytzqk=; b=GR/PNLgJ1faQdH3GCPmpnelmAb3CJ5ncfa4N+/WEaHt/zFz8JePec8l/6xes3QPM3H 9WmqgN/zRw2kIbe5ZdkOEQjm+JYjnJbzprdqCSPMbxj9qTjLwfnYLTcpBifjyNdS0E9x Nx8XgRSeQSO9BLLdA3LVfbU9yOxNGBPdDhuLd6/11KZepWa/7TbB6rlGsTTNC5+zPpr/ Zf4hhq0gsA3k/XDpqxee6/muoqLswnmBtoAgo1onj8ZfvZGaVbrBJ+E/ZZzAztiSLaww LVsxadvAGuF/t+rJWkIcRX+5lgBZr0B21K6vmXh3iUO3u7GZpHcgncz1Lyk54VfJQAt0 /67g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AAGUwBLGfo6yWQC5meFKxNX183kSvTLH8FlPaYytzqk=; b=IzhY1qBOX+r3Fd2Eyrq0IQsqATMH2PlV+xDd3tc1Z52z23N5L1vVVSp49frkIHpmms x8TOp0JM70LTGDWX2qyQevDDXc2dGsC0onkL2dy5Bvt/9RRCZQQqi5mHqUiDmUkwQOvV +G7bx5fCHp9MrYpXx262Vf9Gvw7xa5bRMXXqEJlvHuHBWFUal9MBhyBoMlO7y8CWGoZK oN2P6lbzrORUHHO/KwtxpdDqcih5lV84cZ79G1dCjergnTRjDhQXkmjl6Ry6yQ0shL8M JHtI85yVreSom7pkdGuRFgsr21FLLVpxH9UWOm95w+6bu7Kvf5m7HOz3CGUNWKwPwEO+ XA/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv0h8KrbvNq1hhSkHQCwuAPgICgEQDqzf5T4uDVYk1a+Evk2t8Q6HAn5oRd/z18i3PT3rFGiCHtVY8+0g==
X-Received: by 10.31.188.203 with SMTP id m194mr21497077vkf.120.1471480368447; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.157.144 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.154.119.181]
In-Reply-To: <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net>
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D9E1B04E-EE62-44AD-B98E-05A264FD044C@vigilsec.com> <2D7E9FF7-6121-4E0C-BBCA-FD730F252713@brianrosen.net> <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net>
From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:32:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOPrzE0KKxVUBwczqP7xrJ6BJHnjHu0D+f=KpqkPnHLsQorXAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143a044a8089f053a4db8a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/3h-Km4bvG6p9jNYE7EKO8J1daDk>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [stir] Setting Direction for the STIR WG Last Call
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:32:55 -0000

I thought what I suggested would save all of us a lot of time. I guess that
means you should put each of your comments in the tracker then, one issue
per item, small or large and we can discuss each of them one at a time.

Brian

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 8/17/2016 2:00 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
>
>> May I offer a suggestion?  Let’s ask the authors to submit updates to
>> their drafts that resolve as many of the comments they see as worthy to fix
>> that can be done quickly.  Then let’s ask commenters to look at the diff,
>> identify changes that were NOT made, and use the issue tracker to document
>> them.
>>
>
>
> That's often a good suggestion, but I will suggest not in this case.
>
> For each of the documents -- but especially the cert and 4474bis ones --
> the problems are profound enough to require careful discussion and
> resolution, before changes are safe to make.
>
> d/
>
> --
>
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email