Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force

Martin,

Are these documents (both the SHAKEN stuff and the Display Framework) 
publicly available?

I looked on the sip forum web site but didn't find them.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 8/20/16 8:05 AM, DOLLY, MARTIN C wrote:
> Tony,
>
>
>
> For deployment in the USA, this ITU work would be totally useless.
>
>
>
> The ATIS – SIP Forum is has a profile of the IETF STIR RFC drafts in the
> SHAKEN Framework document.
>
> Further, SHAKEN telecom industry framework - Signature-based Handling of
> Asserted Information using Tokens
>
> 1.      Defines the architecture and NNI dependencies around the usage
> of the PASSporT and 4474bis based framework
>
> 2.      Defines the security model around management and usage of
> certificates used to sign and assert caller identity information
>
>
>
> In addition, there is a Display Framework document, that defines the
> requirements for signaling the verification information from the network
> to the user device and the requirements for what is displayed on the
> user device independent of technology.
>
>
>
> Service Requirements to support the above is being brought into the 3GPP
> SA1 meeting in San Francisco next week, 8/22-26 (Being led by Greg
> Schumacher, Sprint).
>
>
>
> I will be bring in a discussion paper and CRs into the October CT1
> meeting in China with the support of Nokia and Ericsson (and hopefully
> the other USA companies).
>
>
>
> WRT display  on the user device, there will be a combination of vendors
> getting requirements based on the ATIS-SIP Forum Display Framework given
> to them as part of ecosystem participation in the FCC Strike Force
> and/or direct requirements from carriers. In addition, further
> documentation to in GSMA, Cable Labs, etc… specifications may/will occur.
>
>
>
> Up to now, the coordination has been with the ATIS-SIP Forum
> co-chairs/leaders and moving forward with the FCC Strike Force
> Authentication Committee (co-chairs Chris Wendt and myself, so there the
> transition should be seamless)
>
>
>
> With the above work plan I do not see a role for the ITU on the Caller
> ID Spoofing.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> *Martin C. Dolly*
>
> Lead Member of Technical Staff
>
> Core & Government/Regulatory Standards
>
> AT&T
>
> Cell: +1.609.903.3360
>
> Email: _md3135@att.com <mailto:md3135@att.com>_
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Tony Rutkowski [mailto:tony@yaanatech.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 19, 2016 4:48 PM
> *To:* DOLLY, MARTIN C <md3135@att.com>
> *Cc:* IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>; Paul Najarian
> <NajarianPB@state.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force
>
>
>
> Hi Martin et al.,
>
> It is worth noting that for the
> upcoming SG17 meeting, China's
> MIIT, China Unicom, and China mobile
> have proposed a new work item that
> is substantially related to stir work.
> Indeed, the proposal contains a useful
> comprehensive overview of related
> SDO activities, including stir, and
> a gap analysis.
>
> I expect that the usdel to the meeting
> would appreciate any views from the
> Task Force and stir participants on
> the contribution.  In addition, how does
> stir and the IETF anticipate collaborating
> with SG17 and the other SDOs going forward?
> The NWI seems almost certain to get approved,
> and may well be before WTSA 2016.
>
> best,
> --tony
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>