Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Sat, 20 August 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8512D758 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 07:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YfCVmn3zqTBu for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 07:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-admin1.yaanatech.net (63-128-177-34-static.dzbja.com [63.128.177.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122D312D531 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 07:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by sc9-admin1.yaanatech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6FB247; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:27:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-173-67-205-17.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.67.205.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23F458090; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D9E1B04E-EE62-44AD-B98E-05A264FD044C@vigilsec.com> <2D7E9FF7-6121-4E0C-BBCA-FD730F252713@brianrosen.net> <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net> <CAOPrzE0KKxVUBwczqP7xrJ6BJHnjHu0D+f=KpqkPnHLsQorXAA@mail.gmail.com> <4cd5cefb-59a1-f8d8-5bcd-e49cdbad2132@dcrocker.net> <437A953E-7F03-4FD8-B360-40C82D194DCB@att.com> <b8be3b84-4296-95a2-0058-3e5e2d633507@yaanatech.com> <a246b6eb-63f7-328b-80e6-4081460d3642@yaanatech.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836563F625B9A@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
To: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
Message-ID: <aecd36df-aed8-50ed-566b-03c79ad1078b@yaanatech.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 10:27:03 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836563F625B9A@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B3F6997D4529B0B04CD33124"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/DGm_Ym9KrH8hR_Z0PYHXou5Cfcs>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, Paul Najarian <NajarianPB@state.gov>, "Calme, Jim (EXT - US)" <jim.calme.ext@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:27:07 -0000

Hi Martin,

Congratulations again.

This is a very useful overview.  Your providing
ample information at this point is especially
useful for building a common direction.

The "no role" seems like a non-starter.    A better
approach would seem to engage them and any
other fora that emerge as part of the global
constellation you paint.  NFV is an example
where everyone seems to have bought into
that model.  If nothing else, they can produce
TRs that conveys a common model.

It's particularly good to see Greg's SA1
engagement.  Who is working this into GSMA?
ETSI?  3GPP is probably the best global "centroid"
there given its size and stature.

Lastly, given the CA/B Forum's sector
specific expansion of EVcert use, has anyone
engaged them concerning the use of EVcerts?

--tony




On 2016-08-20 8:05 AM, DOLLY, MARTIN C wrote:
> With the above work plan I do not see a role for the ITU on the Caller 
> ID Spoofing.