IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Setting Direction for the STIR WG Last Call

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B95812D135 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqj6dtJslwVj for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D7E12D539 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u7I13jNt030356; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:04:17 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 24vx1hu1rg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:04:16 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7I14F10009237; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:04:15 -0400
Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7I147DH009124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:04:09 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.147]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:03:57 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.2.119]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.147]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:03:57 -0400
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Thread-Topic: [stir] Setting Direction for the STIR WG Last Call
Thread-Index: AQHR+Mlane7/Lh5+oEOg5PSRbp1156BN5joAgAAxvYCAAAmagIAAAnYA///DMYk=
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:03:56 +0000
Message-ID: <437A953E-7F03-4FD8-B360-40C82D194DCB@att.com>
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D9E1B04E-EE62-44AD-B98E-05A264FD044C@vigilsec.com> <2D7E9FF7-6121-4E0C-BBCA-FD730F252713@brianrosen.net> <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net> <CAOPrzE0KKxVUBwczqP7xrJ6BJHnjHu0D+f=KpqkPnHLsQorXAA@mail.gmail.com>, <4cd5cefb-59a1-f8d8-5bcd-e49cdbad2132@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4cd5cefb-59a1-f8d8-5bcd-e49cdbad2132@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_437A953E7F034FD8B36040C82D194DCBattcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-08-17_14:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1608180015
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/avB_h02agRbelyG-kxVMPKbdNTw>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Subject: Re: [stir] Setting Direction for the STIR WG Last Call
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:04:21 -0000

Dave

No disrespect sir, but who other than you see that a major rework is required.

Addressing addition of examples plus addressing Christer's comments works for me

Martin C. Dolly
Lead Member of Technical Staff
Core & Government/Regulatory Standards
AT&T
Cell: +1.609.903.3360<tel:+1.609.903.3360>
Email: md3135@att.com<mailto:md3135@att.com>


On Aug 17, 2016, at 8:41 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net<mailto:dhc@dcrocker.net>> wrote:

On 8/17/2016 5:32 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
I thought what I suggested would save all of us a lot of time. I
guess that means you should put each of your comments in the tracker
then, one issue per item, small or large and we can discuss each of
them one at a time.


If a document requires a major rework, then an author's making small
changes without the benefit of knowing what the rework will not be a
good use of their time.  Neither is asking them to guess at the major
changes.

As for your second sentence, it seems a non-sequitur to me.

d/

--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________
stir mailing list
stir@ietf.org<mailto:stir@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email