IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-passport-05

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 29 July 2016 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EDB12B012 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roGA5P-KMR3c for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (unknown [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50567127078 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u6THSepK020710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:28:41 -0700
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D3C152B2.1A69BA%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <b096b541-c8af-9617-c9d7-5a1beb5230e8@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:27:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D3C152B2.1A69BA%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/_jvJUpiINvBNdBdvlID8hbScNQQ>
Subject: Re: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-passport-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:27:58 -0000

On 7/29/2016 10:12 AM, Peterson, Jon wrote:
> We had a major intervention in the work last fall to the effect that we
> need to build more generically for real-time communications rather than
> just SIP.


I'm not clear what this means.  Can you point to the record of this 
intervention?  And how it changes the technical requirements?  And how 
the current specifications are responsive to that change in scope?

And since the scope was changed, why wasn't the charter:

      The STIR working group will specify Internet-based mechanisms that 
allow verification of the calling party's authorization to use a 
particular telephone number for an incoming call.



d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email