Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Fri, 19 August 2016 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D0F12D0EE for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id opT3FZWkJYA8 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-admin1.yaanatech.net (63-128-177-34-static.dzbja.com [63.128.177.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EFD12D0C5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by sc9-admin1.yaanatech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C94E3BF; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:48:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-173-67-205-17.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.67.205.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA57F58090; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
References: <07e0eb16-6758-cdf1-c571-1f1ed768e741@dcrocker.net> <D9E1B04E-EE62-44AD-B98E-05A264FD044C@vigilsec.com> <2D7E9FF7-6121-4E0C-BBCA-FD730F252713@brianrosen.net> <9e8d2b2c-2735-d8db-0682-755ff294f9f8@dcrocker.net> <CAOPrzE0KKxVUBwczqP7xrJ6BJHnjHu0D+f=KpqkPnHLsQorXAA@mail.gmail.com> <4cd5cefb-59a1-f8d8-5bcd-e49cdbad2132@dcrocker.net> <437A953E-7F03-4FD8-B360-40C82D194DCB@att.com> <b8be3b84-4296-95a2-0058-3e5e2d633507@yaanatech.com>
To: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
Message-ID: <a246b6eb-63f7-328b-80e6-4081460d3642@yaanatech.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:48:02 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b8be3b84-4296-95a2-0058-3e5e2d633507@yaanatech.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------526E5E713A1BD152F5EE3B3B"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/lgNPu5LOK2ym2x38VkPkjpIOdAE>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, Paul Najarian <NajarianPB@state.gov>
Subject: Re: [stir] Robocall Strike Force
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:48:06 -0000

Hi Martin et al.,

It is worth noting that for the
upcoming SG17 meeting, China's
MIIT, China Unicom, and China mobile
have proposed a new work item that
is substantially related to stir work.
Indeed, the proposal contains a useful
comprehensive overview of related
SDO activities, including stir, and
a gap analysis.

I expect that the usdel to the meeting
would appreciate any views from the
Task Force and stir participants on
the contribution.  In addition, how does
stir and the IETF anticipate collaborating
with SG17 and the other SDOs going forward?
The NWI seems almost certain to get approved,
and may well be before WTSA 2016.

best,
--tony

On 2016-08-19 4:26 PM, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> Could you provide guidance on:
> 1) repositories of strike force related material?
> 2) which industry bodies will be engaged in
> this effort?
> 3) how the various industry standard bodies
> will be coordinated?