IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A9BC14CE37 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46EGUXU1zdv4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1807DC14CE45 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml713-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M5nl2671Sz67f6D; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:39:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.227) by fraeml713-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:42:25 +0200
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) by mscpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:42:24 +0300
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) by mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:42:24 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "buraglio@es.net" <buraglio@es.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
Thread-Index: AQHYoi0ZEjRK7z4aJ0mo31PReLBUu62TUvkAgACe0QCAACL2AIAADSQAgAACUYCAAEx0gIAA9pUAgBAq/YCAAQhUgIABXaZAgAAxMgCAAT4qYP//38aAgABDyZD///HBAIABfReggABi+gCABGRtQA==
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:42:24 +0000
Message-ID: <a6975472445f49018abab153fa61b399@huawei.com>
References: <e4a35f0c-757a-aefa-c211-05b6015a4215@gmail.com> <YuJXbruluDmzF3RD@Space.Net> <ec68b29c62034d3e98adec9c5da45ff3@huawei.com> <25e4f9e4-e055-241c-7047-97dca8b09cc8@gmail.com> <3c35a91af90d4b82af724e7ce98378d3@huawei.com> <CAE=N4xcPq3CB5DDjPOk3oAqBfpJRebhXsFExSEAX_Yr3_XsSUg@mail.gmail.com> <97662d43-7daa-191c-792b-49a626fb9769@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_w9n2=cXc=mgsr8iOx2rndAWgPhnoNBs4UQnJd3gJxNA@mail.gmail.com> <CADzU5g4mSqqVXE9ppe1U=dMM59GUPviArL_5tiQe0yxm-YZrgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9tOGuy8scXStxOTzWOwG_zvDHx4Hi5CwkGiYmzNLOvqw@mail.gmail.com> <9687af1f59a6492f8353ade4d920fa95@huawei.com> <CAM5+tA8UF-3ZHkE0npZ0r5sDQ+FudTSPhpWns1BsPCk=NecX+Q@mail.gmail.com> <7e4606c4534c49a593863bda870b6e63@huawei.com> <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com> <b9f33aa499b043bb90ff926731db9739@huawei.com> <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.202.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7TH30pHZn1e3Lglt3OFsI_9Jt7c>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:42:33 -0000

> When it comes to, say, an enterprise network that accesses the Internet, preserving the IID is not something that folks will usually be interested in -- quite the opposite, I'd say.

Why?

Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fernando@gont.com.ar] 
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 7:37 PM
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>; David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>; buraglio@es.net
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

On 12/8/22 04:59, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
> It is possible every time people talk about NAT to say
> 
> “Yes for NAT, but the NPT flavor of NAT is better. It preserves ports 
> and IID, hence it does not need logging and fewer interrupt 
> applications. It is stateless, hence cheaper and scalable.”

When it comes to, say, an enterprise network that accesses the Internet, preserving the IID is not something that folks will usually be interested in -- quite the opposite, I'd say.

Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar
PGP Fingerprint: 7F7F 686D 8AC9 3319 EEAD C1C8 D1D5 4B94 E301 6F01

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email