Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com> Sun, 28 August 2022 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D374C14CE46 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6a_kNt2que8d for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr85p00im-ztdg06011101.me.com (mr85p00im-ztdg06011101.me.com [17.58.23.185]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DFD3C14CF1C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1661710590; bh=nNtC0binZjClUc9czB3+ZWEz2mQrh+tk6O+KK1GHMGI=; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:To; b=qx1TQZsgKaGq4ZoTYM+D0JbMxiUcSo4HJzTP09BOnTlE1hKaDm0rrQCoTff7OJ533 yae1V2ffM4BK2SpXPNYO1A5O/ZlbM6192gZA52raBVj69ZBQk1uJFWkPY0IxD4IK43 qVjP8i03MzJNM9hr7P6L4i21JzXHhozubvyISynWasfyBlAbDBBN3YqvJUCbXtmf0h sQwwE2oyVOIPuZccymP/o6wv15xrd/XrQDc+8i3psOHz1RMSQUswWJFpTzAzahrVlM +XjPWteC6e22QecbFi83XazTCztctxuL0efgULj6DDFmtYyPwJ2SbuZaI846IfutwT MrwJPkscDxS8Q==
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (mr38p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.152.18]) by mr85p00im-ztdg06011101.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 316CEDA08C9; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 18:16:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
Message-Id: <C60DC609-5485-4116-B860-7365BF7B53B3@icloud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_71F4DA28-BDCD-43AE-B155-FCEA048725E4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:16:27 -0700
In-Reply-To: <0292596c-4458-f933-04c9-781f3a524c2f@si6networks.com>
Cc: shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <e4a35f0c-757a-aefa-c211-05b6015a4215@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.2207280423190.17625@sleekfreak.ath.cx> <0292596c-4458-f933-04c9-781f3a524c2f@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
X-Proofpoint-GUID: dYUmMfoxC4_Vm3xYj1UFRw2UMYm31G1W
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: dYUmMfoxC4_Vm3xYj1UFRw2UMYm31G1W
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc2903e8d5c8f:6.0.425,18.0.572,17.11.62.513.0000000 definitions=2022-01-14_01:2022-01-14_01,2020-02-14_11,2021-12-02_01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=762 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2208280074
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/eZlzK_1NVCAfnOkMwuWMQCXE5VU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 18:16:37 -0000

I’m a bit late to this discussion, but there are a few comments I want to make.

> On Aug 12, 2022, at 2:54 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 28/7/22 05:25, shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx wrote:
>> Bell Labs gave UNIX to universities to make sure that they had a forthcoming generation of engineers that they could hire.  Are we properly supporting IPv6 education in universities, so that the next generation does not require a full time technical specialist to deploy and/or maintain a v6 or dual stack network?

Arguably, Bell Labs’ giving of Unix to universities didn’t render unnecessary full-time technical Unix specialists as you describe.  As is the case with network engineers, system administrators needed to be educated and groomed to maintain Unix systems.
But I wonder if the (relative) lack of (for lack of a better phrase) engineering professionals who provide networking products and services is more a reflection of how money is spent.  For example, when I was an MIT undergraduate during the early 1980s,  there were people such as Saltzer and Clark doing what would eventually become IETF work.  But there were a larger group of people doing AI research.  From what I could tell, they had more money, and thus were able to attract more students (and staffers).  They even had networking projects based on Chaosnet.  Nowadays, from what I can tell, AI gets more research and investment money than networking, and thus draws more students, staffers, etc.  It’s presented as an exciting field, full of promise for the future.

> The IPv6 part that you may want universities to cover is anything associated with principles. -- i.e., you don't want universities to produce a workforce of IPv6 engineers, but rather to teach what ew got right and what we didn't, such that when IPv[x] needs to be engineered, they are able to do a good job.

+1

For what it’s worth, Peterson and Davie’s Computer Networks: A Systems Approach <https://book.systemsapproach.org/> has a section on IPv6, but also has a full chapter devoted to networking principles.

Greg