IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E19C1524B9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjOERuvsGuTG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D56C1524B8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2800:810:464:f13:6623:ffb1:f7bf:cc40] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:f13:6623:ffb1:f7bf:cc40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE2D22800BA; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:54:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <c43e3ce9-86d3-307c-270b-ed3a8cf33ecc@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:54:22 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CAM5+tA8UF-3ZHkE0npZ0r5sDQ+FudTSPhpWns1BsPCk=NecX+Q@mail.gmail.com> <7e4606c4534c49a593863bda870b6e63@huawei.com> <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com> <b9f33aa499b043bb90ff926731db9739@huawei.com> <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar> <a6975472445f49018abab153fa61b399@huawei.com> <YvoaJ+IJdl/VXYLj@Space.Net> <1cdf7569a11d43e2b4fdd8675b657e42@huawei.com> <YvoilaQfj40uYI5X@Space.Net> <2e465d49-7636-1a09-0b0a-1616c3840bb8@gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e465d49-7636-1a09-0b0a-1616c3840bb8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pL6e9vcpBdOjixvWVr9GB3scrI8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:54:31 -0000

Hi, Soni,

On 15/8/22 07:44, Soni "They/Them" L. wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022-08-15 07:40, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
>>> Hence, temporary addresses are needed.
>>
>> Temporary addresses are mostly a no-go for enterprise environments.
>>
>> People do not want to pay for privacy *in* the enterprise network - that
>> stuff gets in the way of auditing, reverse DNS and all, and just adds hassles.
> 
> we're surprised temporary addresses still aren't a thing browsers "just
> do", honestly. (we guess there aren't any OS APIs for it, tho.)

Please do check 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-addressing-considerations

We cover exactly that topic.

Thanks,
-- 
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email