IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

"Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C32C1524CB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lutha6ekWm2x for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA1B3C14F738 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id f23so1345487uap.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc; bh=bqtrSKzhyDRBSF+PEA/YrNOvbKmQtUaNcXQ1sQ1vbfk=; b=fViR36o9KM5+D7eomIhnJBFTPlkaW5MQt1ANilwnZ4UNPhprdeZlxrQYH2XSIppkzj pBasprM1K0xSUHaO5Y8e8Cf17gpxz/P0d6hX4JHJzoTlA58lKyzDXGwKrh3NyE08KjEh OAnzjK1GZvOuEO4vELwmTyR9SadTIFy+y187dDFmyGFKge9Iu+U+gmiz7hbxUyq/t0Vz ZIGbo5E2A4I5o6yv+HkVO2yhinh88VfHGxE/2ohIUaNYXfr7E9Tj38Y+z+6nJscr5aca fl1bDD8lL3qjsQVlU39yTxzHV3zVjT1ByiFOpxeYBC2CvF94cEKayvAjPuh7QccgDptd sIPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=bqtrSKzhyDRBSF+PEA/YrNOvbKmQtUaNcXQ1sQ1vbfk=; b=QNEFUPoy+n/UVWc1PiI+QSOp0pr0wqdlJqlofqE9xXcsH8tpU36HIFAjsAJjbdOax7 LShmrOSA3WccTesfEI0l1th6Syvqf8Vl/AO+YlFkOpdhdvG9Jq9vMGOInXpXQv16knYr gRDbJYxOpHb4QrFmWh9uDuYmXZfapSglQdeikzzJlCZF6DHOZeIQSqTvRUXBFmYp8Rjs Lt75Y6EBv64OPILB9tMDASV5zrO08x3otV3GuNs3yloMTlZ+j6kEJQEDeju+iIkXrZXi BaqL1c1vH+/WLlJZRUijKg0BK4XXu5Rga7bNi5QPLlzE+Omg2Xhslj7IRyOJ32dzQhTf n6NA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1W3XSRRmnp6Ql3FKQN1/Bps+pSCxqOGjcg9hJonEvJfZAcEyj9 SYZs8+5+zdlETkg7P88XQNpyM2HNqco=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4vYoPF019G2zVjLDykgk0eSujuGBWPiSeO8eoVpUw1Old5FXLV2r6xf5hARGHun0FjBxfSzA==
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:760d:0:b0:384:cea0:b24f with SMTP id o13-20020ab0760d000000b00384cea0b24fmr6927251uap.7.1660579666094; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2804:431:cfcd:6994::536f:6e69? ([2804:431:cfcd:6994::536f:6e69]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020ac5cb09000000b00376cf28248bsm6958765vkl.28.2022.08.15.09.07.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: "Soni L." <fakedme@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3ea43ae8-a88e-8d44-1b21-7b66f3924980@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:07:42 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com> <b9f33aa499b043bb90ff926731db9739@huawei.com> <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar> <a6975472445f49018abab153fa61b399@huawei.com> <YvoaJ+IJdl/VXYLj@Space.Net> <1cdf7569a11d43e2b4fdd8675b657e42@huawei.com> <YvoilaQfj40uYI5X@Space.Net> <2e465d49-7636-1a09-0b0a-1616c3840bb8@gmail.com> <YvolSM4c05Hu2YAn@Space.Net>
From: "Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <YvolSM4c05Hu2YAn@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QjW6lVTVfWlyWpKuo4DInuym9A4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:07:47 -0000


On 2022-08-15 07:51, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:44:39AM -0300, Soni "They/Them" L. wrote:
> > On 2022-08-15 07:40, Gert Doering wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
> > > > Hence, temporary addresses are needed.
> > >
> > > Temporary addresses are mostly a no-go for enterprise environments.
> > >
> > > People do not want to pay for privacy *in* the enterprise network - that
> > > stuff gets in the way of auditing, reverse DNS and all, and just adds hassles.
> > 
> > we're surprised temporary addresses still aren't a thing browsers "just
> > do", honestly. (we guess there aren't any OS APIs for it, tho.)
>
> Thank god.
>
> Browsers inventing their own DNS resolution schemes is bad enough.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
We want to address this because nobody else has.

We do not like it when IPv6 enables cross-website tracking in spite of
browser-based protections, including the ability to separately identify
household/community participants, which would be entirely avoidable if
the IPv6 stack had full built-in support for ephemeral addresses and
browsers used them per-tab or so.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email