Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 19 August 2022 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2751BC14F6EC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2feZoevpbluZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD721C14F6E7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id h28so5087609pfq.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=Q+mbmmaLux2rF8jhCt6YMe1lf+YtQubLUV3IFXcx/Qg=; b=ETeaG7h9b6c9edZY/yD7x28IrEGtICpIcKfO3larLtQLRBrTFUOAcZqLsEbp3TbpHm +3PjyY9QmpvCRyrQsqGm31KarakcEL0ELa2IV/WDPDHqK+ULixAbRpPiQri2Z59XRii+ L9AySvEHADwlEoog4wCQu2mKCnFz2X6daEfw0ePXLP1vMXqck6QtjqKEpPnzHoduY4uU N7o02K2W4GLE/NmfNgQgXYbtunB+2aiazWDYIU+ILIbNgWchukbYS0xc41hGmkKBl9zg lemOSjX/odcrPgpN/KPVuANB1TYPVu/EblQ+2FZOZ0MihnjHMKOWaNAV2EqT3037mhYD bIAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=Q+mbmmaLux2rF8jhCt6YMe1lf+YtQubLUV3IFXcx/Qg=; b=6xDea+QMyIYHiSNuurHbzd1f/YgDk6h0XMdBhaSYgOwBe5pFgVpjLfL8O02JuU6fs0 HjZ8xRXL/QGuS6NPV1EIN7jT9+T4B6EAc1C/MfZDCKB4oG2mHd5y3CLxbctTes7fBt/1 mBOz3aM5nZ9wshho1yduuVKZt1YPNoP7jIw8A1XhAV3KrxJAj5OzwajlS8mA16sFbuuS GLXdT0Lg8DluTLBSTXfIqvxZq+34mze+G+s4xPXPLXrq4VYdJ7aLRQhzd21OxuieAmiM /jDjiQfiQLFl6klA9OX1lXxpbTwmyCcsY7mquoZxa1Xuag+3zz39KS/AaVTkH8nXfp9U 9XaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo272zZZyg54JyR7rAymew3fwpEMx4olYjTpjYGp2vNh/0r+taRn Zh2B2IjqDOpk9gGYphHNrOw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6DaHx3NMNhLCil9b6LFXOsfLxUGBg22MOlySG2keWgpltcxvX+QTPaGPc84MGrUXl0x9YnIA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:8446:0:b0:535:d9e2:d137 with SMTP id k67-20020a628446000000b00535d9e2d137mr8032996pfd.29.1660936175253; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip68-111-231-227.sd.sd.cox.net. [68.111.231.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14-20020a170902b68e00b0017086b082c1sm3463269pls.173.2022.08.19.12.09.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ea43ae8-a88e-8d44-1b21-7b66f3924980@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:09:31 -0700
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9B8691E8-AD21-4A87-8735-DEBE4E0CDCED@gmail.com>
References: <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com> <b9f33aa499b043bb90ff926731db9739@huawei.com> <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar> <a6975472445f49018abab153fa61b399@huawei.com> <YvoaJ+IJdl/VXYLj@Space.Net> <1cdf7569a11d43e2b4fdd8675b657e42@huawei.com> <YvoilaQfj40uYI5X@Space.Net> <2e465d49-7636-1a09-0b0a-1616c3840bb8@gmail.com> <YvolSM4c05Hu2YAn@Space.Net> <3ea43ae8-a88e-8d44-1b21-7b66f3924980@gmail.com>
To: "Soni They/Them L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9yZ6Xebv6rLyKK1Af2De5CpXbww>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:09:38 -0000


> On Aug 15, 2022, at 9:07 AM, Soni They/Them L. <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We do not like it when IPv6 enables cross-website tracking in spite of
> browser-based protections, including the ability to separately identify
> household/community participants, which would be entirely avoidable if
> the IPv6 stack had full built-in support for ephemeral addresses and
> browsers used them per-tab or so.


I'm going to ask the obvious question. What is the difference between an "ephemeral" address and a "temporary" address? I think you're asking for a temporary address that is used for a specific purpose (a tab, a tcp session, whatever) and then forgotten.