Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 11:13 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C38C1522B2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.998, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.998, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezyimZn2rNTC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A27C1522B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id f30so6386952pfq.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=DtKkQthw24yJGhZ2pitjsJFpxg0p8espA0KXR/OkYrc=; b=RjJRPE3iPMpOLnfJv3Wp2Mo7NwVewa0uqPIQJDKjTI/PshgmwL/YHFcuG+VaWhSznc 1ssE6rKba2/fvJeTnQBlDIpDGssY5YrsS/AJb+aykPTxHvJ4EZfewuM+a+zc/6aduHmq ktSSfTzcAXA5dRyxJox3P39aHspUdCs9MWeIuP4AUWnVTYagSR1tqvy5iZJKjjWBe6Nm Yy9hH0yajHS/QAtts6LT5+iaWaqUcIJQRgzbJG1Q/NAfWLQ8rSuhf9L0pJWTjyTjtqDI YmO96AuORkJrDW/yy4lEwW8IAq7/reVPcbvxO7A/yXUASGnJzCCbD+7+urQNgPbuRFG1 gL7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=DtKkQthw24yJGhZ2pitjsJFpxg0p8espA0KXR/OkYrc=; b=BBxd0WyCAs9Y9nzv6ANLrW+HepUZjauNNEtbbip0GRbJ6CWO8S3Jlv+2sTOYsgKmX1 CveegCtd0x1G99h8DnuKqMf5FZRhk1ahxp/tf6VgiFDmoPQ/SnfB0/hHzN/vF0AHdpxD yB6WTUBztnMIvnQU8SZYCAEEpg/FxXsTW9NVBrAbdFnzkWAx7JAFKpLSK4XuQwM2EAfl 6WoeZwokYOl/KLBQFP8tA5aK4UORCp9eINZvYCSRmE9B8RCSJ4uvZr9PcQvXWfCV4uqe C4JYhqKsoTMEfMkIgcbeNh9igO1VcJdjR8rDii/6nbamJqd/FjUdWDFJppHKoUlMjIUd BUeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0XMFCZaiDRWSpc9+LIrNZ91lm9YA/HnW5okETH/9JKGoZPrLDB jXDa1RTs4tF/Xx4JzYH1sAsEz7s6nkKoRlsGBIr/NGLO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR59q3xhPRoXalSNcRX8auJq8gVvV7M61WBqzbYNS77zUV1UzbPMxuGbMRC7Feb2E1z7CddSraHFwP6Pfk3gpSo=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d60b:0:b0:429:7f1e:aa6 with SMTP id q11-20020a63d60b000000b004297f1e0aa6mr1229966pgg.492.1660561993517; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM5+tA9tOGuy8scXStxOTzWOwG_zvDHx4Hi5CwkGiYmzNLOvqw@mail.gmail.com> <9687af1f59a6492f8353ade4d920fa95@huawei.com> <CAM5+tA8UF-3ZHkE0npZ0r5sDQ+FudTSPhpWns1BsPCk=NecX+Q@mail.gmail.com> <7e4606c4534c49a593863bda870b6e63@huawei.com> <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com> <b9f33aa499b043bb90ff926731db9739@huawei.com> <b885bdd4-d837-1eda-9614-36c76190d920@gont.com.ar> <a6975472445f49018abab153fa61b399@huawei.com> <YvoaJ+IJdl/VXYLj@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <YvoaJ+IJdl/VXYLj@Space.Net>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:13:04 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xnE_NeTnTJ8MTTiKX2oZ5Wo6Rxss-42hqHzwJ7O_iXwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c04e5405e645b7f5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YSDDuivN-IruHSWXIU6YlbVYOsM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:13:50 -0000
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, 20:06 Gert Doering, <gert@space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:42:24AM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote: > > > When it comes to, say, an enterprise network that accesses the > Internet, preserving the IID is not something that folks will usually be > interested in -- quite the opposite, I'd say. > > > > Why? > > Hiding of internal information. > There are ways you can do that on IPv6. A single /64 has more address space than the entire 32 bit IPv4 address space, 4 billion times more. So if you want to hide your IPv6 topology, put every host in a single /64, via something like ISATAP + RFC7217 and RFC8981, tunneled over IPv4, or something else that allows you to put all hosts in a single IPv6/64, like EVPN. An IPsec VPN concentrator is another example of something that can put everybody in the same /64. > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- [v6ops] Are we competitive? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? shogunx
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gábor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Soni "They/Them" L.
- [v6ops] book6 [was: Are we competitive?] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gábor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Soni "They/Them" L.
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Soni "They/Them" L.
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Soni "They/Them" L.
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Greg Skinner
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Soni "They/Them" L.
- Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive? Gmail