IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 12 August 2022 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06D5C159483 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 01:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0ojnaASDx_W for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 01:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F13C14F6E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 01:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1660293713; x=1691829713; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=k8pbg5UYOtZx3ex6WpjyLP5eVxzRN0unugbeK7+t/ig=; b=EFZwG6tnjxgBR9A0c0Axxm9mUByeeO7oMxBueQVMXIx0Nxz/wiMLz4Ls TXgulsaUxMrcWMvf6tg+Zi/VtMzyGxmeAkZGIfUIUan44GLk9WfhgjZuv mAZSFBolLk6axpcoJTqui2xzdMkeSXFCW2koykEwUXzVX9lYd+/eQnA9m 7MLErgCwUiiEnMgXFuvehAtxatJZXa/mhC74MIZ1Uvia4CF8c6ZgvaS8g oqwHCg1TccB2Jjx4u38ff3tbgBJK/AE31/kPVZzK94pSlnJamlPw+k8MD 0ybGQuYpSYYPpe/u9S7MxZzt9vLle2RdqZXqTYPEvGuELm5PlJ/Go9wWQ g==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Aug 2022 10:41:48 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9EA418A8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:41:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB79040EB1; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:41:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id C7E4413BC06; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:41:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:41:47 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <YvYSS/04rpaDfLi9@Space.Net>
References: <97662d43-7daa-191c-792b-49a626fb9769@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_w9n2=cXc=mgsr8iOx2rndAWgPhnoNBs4UQnJd3gJxNA@mail.gmail.com> <CADzU5g4mSqqVXE9ppe1U=dMM59GUPviArL_5tiQe0yxm-YZrgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9tOGuy8scXStxOTzWOwG_zvDHx4Hi5CwkGiYmzNLOvqw@mail.gmail.com> <9687af1f59a6492f8353ade4d920fa95@huawei.com> <CAM5+tA8UF-3ZHkE0npZ0r5sDQ+FudTSPhpWns1BsPCk=NecX+Q@mail.gmail.com> <7e4606c4534c49a593863bda870b6e63@huawei.com> <3f138b03-940a-e83a-6c6e-6039506b6e4b@gont.com.ar> <10f89b7cbe784881bd22b4af81577aa6@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau0nz0TouDnz5pei0MCmTzSbP8q+gHLx1m0sxX0hsuPX3w@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XSHmlph-TMvbsIdYbT05XotaMvo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:41:58 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:59:08AM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> It may be evident to you and me, but it???s not necessary evident to
> everyone. Furthermore, you need to discuss NAT66, if you have any hope of
> showing that NPT is a superior solution to NAT66. The idea that NAT66 will
> go away if we just don???t talk about it, is utterly false.
> 
> The point that I and others are trying to make is that NAT66 exists and it
> needs to be talked about. Do you, I, and most others in this conversation
> think there are better solutions in almost all cases, sure, but you don???t
> convince anyone else of that fact without discussing NAT66.

Indeed.  Possible variants need to be explained, and their upsides and
drawbacks worked out.

Whether or not NAT66 (masquerading) is inferior to NPT66 depends very
much on the use case...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email