Re: [vwrap] Statements of Consensus. Flexibity First.

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2011 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495713A6A7D for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZSOTQBYEDYoh for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487333A691E for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1766368iwn.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i36nquxfwtmWOo4ypXAb1Rzk3l/EpadcBuiNt5Pnlww=; b=UeREkPcHqd0854/1GmQgtCPhH2Y1vdfMg/SJVYyMqX2NTqaCTSK3BhmvMfIlZAZwXI WkPcvRB+R/wDwdpn7X2pJAIA9qY5YFZ9XATSszohnJqqVPvsMJR4uhlpgZ2mKuAULByv pYKG9m3yRFpZ4EW+KNvV8u/gRS6TG2Qa//e1Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O9tR20bh0JwAgKbR5JnImdfCZgWIJVMSbsSLI9zcpRQQwl7TLTi2TiCcn1ol3rkb/S g3iLhZzDnzfjS1llZndmw0cu6vI+xHx/5CezawQoWuWcL6SEpKTvDOwkSYT9tmNnMT7k Wc8IB+JB5eVErp5OcorJ/RuaqMb5ALNJBQ2EY=
Received: by 10.43.49.67 with SMTP id uz3mr1359989icb.526.1301510742334; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-71-137-195-251.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [71.137.195.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xi12sm96729icb.18.2011.03.30.11.45.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D937A2D.1090505@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:45:01 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@hp.com>
References: <20110330011458.GB8908@alinoe.com> <4D931434.2030206@boroon.dasgupta.ch> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD92FDE22F3F@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <AANLkTimaA3qcKOUUjQzvq86R1UMvamTc4yJh4NBMp_Gq@mail.gmail.com> <1301499645.12359.10.camel@mdickson-hplinux> <4D93620C.3000505@gmail.com> <1301502034.12359.19.camel@mdickson-hplinux> <4D936430.4090401@gmail.com> <1301507163.12359.21.camel@mdickson-hplinux>
In-Reply-To: <1301507163.12359.21.camel@mdickson-hplinux>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Statements of Consensus. Flexibity First.
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:44:04 -0000

I hope authentication with optional PGP/GPG signed assets are part of 
the first level of service definitions/partitions. This may be as simple 
as the optional sign-on authentication debated about half-year or so ago 
on this list.

Mike Dickson wrote:
> If we can get agreement amongst a set of folks that want to work from
> that perspective (I do) then I agree that starting with existing
> "service" definitions and the partitioning of work into services and
> protocols is the appropriate place to (re)start.
>
> Mike
>   


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant