Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announcement list

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Mon, 27 September 2021 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD033A08C7; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3fIBowprSSZ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F033A08CB; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::1] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:1]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 18RFaHbL210738 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:36:18 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1632756979; bh=4Wbv9miqDTzohUO8n8iDsP/oWf5nFTOMYGggL1L8rRU=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=uH6DOpv99pQ/0StUwN1Zg/exOpcgJcMorRkYJRCwZ59IofYp0LT6SGLuxYLhE+tuL nlEyTfAImleWdTLS/NllecXDvXP3MdEgGJiU90T8mJI3B0xNFS4AeKIE3fNlCuzBce c72tny4q/2qd1qiQg4TnVQk7nmKTQLANHj1L0t4A=
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <f22d22ea-80da-e595-d91f-c577461766a3@huitema.net> <44B61547-1B28-4D1C-88C1-4AD7BA7F9639@lear.ch> <69E7C755-D09C-447B-B327-4F13C19A3EED@eggert.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Subject: Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announcement list
Message-ID: <475d7515-f71a-c3f0-e455-03336226cc47@lear.ch>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:36:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69E7C755-D09C-447B-B327-4F13C19A3EED@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WEeFhDecrh8kVZXrpl7cHmDbwkXA7olEU"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/X1xktYZ9boEoAzR21cn12l3wsTU>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:36:46 -0000

Hi Lars,

I'm sorry, but this is a corollary to Housley's Law, which borrows from 
many, including Benjamin Franklin:

    I have already made this paper too long, for which I must crave
    pardon, not having now time to make it shorter.

In an admirable effort to be transparent, we have inundated this list in 
particular with data.  We now need to take the time to reduce that data  
to usable information.  Please take another swing.

Eliot

On 27.09.21 12:59, Lars Eggert wrote:
> we discussed that (at length) in the IESG. There were very different opinions on which content should remain on ietf-announce and which should be moved elsewhere. I think I've seen signs in the feedback thread that there are probably very different views on that in the broader community as well. Hence the decision to propose a new mailing list.